Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

There is a deep-rooted cultural problem where marketing agencies and brands create work to win awards from their peers, not to sell products for their clients. This internal focus leads to celebrating campaigns that are critically acclaimed within the industry but fail to impact the business's bottom line.

Related Insights

The ad industry's most celebrated work no longer correlates with commercial success. The IPA found that 20 years ago, awarded work was 12 times more effective than non-awarded work. Now, there's a "crisis of creative effectiveness" where award-winning ads have no commercial impact, suggesting they are made for judges, not consumers.

Ad agencies possess immense creative problem-solving talent but narrowly confine it to communication campaigns. They could deliver enormous value by redesigning a menu's choice architecture or fixing customer journey friction, but don't because clients lack the job titles and procurement processes to buy such "trivia."

Marketing efforts are crippled by two core issues: subjective opinions on creative driven by ego, and flawed reporting that either uses outdated vanity metrics or is so hyper-quantitative that it misses the emotional side of brand building. This prevents teams from measuring what truly drives business impact.

CFOs are increasingly skeptical of marketing efforts, viewing industry awards and brand lift studies as irrelevant if sales are down. Marketing leaders must shift their focus and language to concrete business results, as CFOs are now the key decision-makers who are unimpressed by traditional marketing metrics.

Marketing operates like venture capital, where a few massive hits, like American Express's "Member Since," generate most of the long-term value. However, it is held accountable for every penny of cost while only getting credit for a fraction of the long-term upside, creating a fundamental misalignment in how it's measured.

The modern disconnect between creative campaigns and business results stems from a structural flaw: the unbundling of media buying and creative services into separate agencies. Brands that succeed today, like DTC startups, inherently integrate these two functions, ensuring creative is always measured against business performance.

Marketing struggles for board-level respect because it focuses on tactical outputs like ads ('what we do') rather than its strategic mindset of customer-centric value creation ('how we think'). Shifting the narrative from tactical execution to strategic thinking elevates marketing's perceived importance within an organization.

Many large agencies are not truly consumer-centric. Their business model incentivizes focusing on winning industry awards (like Cannes Lions), pleasing internal stakeholders, and navigating corporate politics. This creates a fundamental disconnect from where consumer attention actually is, leading to ineffective marketing spend.

Marketing's seat at the executive table is not guaranteed. As a traditional cost center, it must continuously prove its ROI. This requires a relentless internal campaign that showcases successes and links marketing activities directly to business results, not as a boast, but as a core operational function.

The discussion over in-house versus agency marketing is a distraction from the fundamental problem. The core failure in most marketing today—from billboards to social posts—is a lack of strategic intent. Brands are simply 'posting shit' without a clear purpose, a flaw that exists regardless of who executes the work.