Contrary to Econ 101's labor-leisure tradeoff, unconditional cash transfers consistently lead to an increase in work in low-income countries. Recipients are capital-constrained, and the cash enables them to start small businesses, leading to a zero or positive effect on labor supply.

Beyond traditional energy projects, there's a growing opportunity for large-scale, long-duration capital in "social infrastructure." Mature private education platforms and hospital networks in developing markets are now predictable enough to attract lower-cost capital, creating a new asset class for multi-billion dollar impact funds.

Government-administered aid programs are often highly inefficient, with significant overhead costs meaning only "cents on the dollar" reach the intended recipients. A more effective solution is to provide direct cash transfers or vouchers, empowering individuals to spend the money within the existing private market.

The impact of an inheritance extends beyond net worth; it alters life choices. A survey reveals 46% of recipients feel more financially secure and 40% improve their savings. Critically, some also report retiring earlier or reducing their workloads, suggesting a direct link between wealth transfers and labor market shifts.

Raising the minimum wage often benefits individuals in higher-income households (e.g., teens with summer jobs) rather than the poorest families. The most vulnerable are often not in work. A more generous welfare state that directly provides money to poor households is a more targeted and effective way to reduce poverty and inequality.

America's mental health crisis is largely driven by economic precarity. Systemic solutions like a higher minimum wage, affordable housing, and universal healthcare would be more effective at improving population well-being than an individualistic focus on therapy, which often treats symptoms rather than the root cause of financial stress.

In nascent markets, product work is inherently tied to solving fundamental human problems. This reality forces a focus on meaningful outcomes like saving lives or reducing poverty, making typical tech vanity metrics feel trivial by comparison.

Reaching a 100x increase in charitable impact isn't from a single change but from combining principles that each act as a multiplier. For instance, shifting focus to a more neglected problem (10x) and choosing a leveraged policy solution (10x) can result in a 100x total improvement.

To meaningfully reduce wealth inequality, policy should focus on enabling asset accumulation for lower and middle-income families. This includes making homeownership, higher education, childcare, and elder care more affordable and accessible, as these are critical levers for long-term wealth creation.