By combining public and private strategies, the firm observes that public markets react more quickly to crises. This provides predictive insights into the slower-moving private markets, creating an informational edge to anticipate cycles and opportunities before they fully materialize.

Before the market crash, key indicators showed hedge funds' gross exposure (the total value of long and short positions) was at historic highs. This extreme leverage meant that any catalyst forcing de-risking would inevitably trigger a large, cascading deleveraging event, regardless of the initial narrative.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, the massive flow of capital into passive indexes and short-term systematic strategies has reduced the number of actors focused on long-term fundamentals. This creates price dislocations and volatility, offering alpha for patient investors.

Contrary to popular belief, the market may be getting less efficient. The dominance of indexing, quant funds, and multi-manager pods—all with short time horizons—creates dislocations. This leaves opportunities for long-term investors to buy valuable assets that are neglected because their path to value creation is uncertain.

The number of public companies has nearly halved since the 90s, concentrating capital into fewer assets. This scarcity, combined with passive funds locking up float, creates structural imbalances. Sophisticated retail traders can now identify these situations and trigger gamma squeezes, challenging institutional dominance.

The private equity market is following the hedge fund industry's maturation curve. Just as hedge funds saw a consolidation around large platforms and niche specialists, a "shakeout" is coming for undifferentiated, mid-market private equity firms that lack a unique edge or sufficient scale.

Investment gains often come from "multiple expansion," where the market's perception of a business improves, causing it to trade at a higher valuation. This sentiment shift is frequently more impactful than pure earnings growth, and underestimating it is a primary reason for selling winning stocks too early.

An estimated 80-90% of institutional trading is driven by quant funds and multi-manager platforms with one-to-three-month incentive cycles. This structure forces a short-term view, creating massive earnings volatility. This presents a structural advantage for long-term investors who can underwrite through the noise and exploit the resulting mispricings caused by career-risk-averse managers.

Contrary to classic theory, markets may be growing less efficient. This is driven not only by passive indexing but also by a structural shift in active management towards short-term, quantitative strategies that prioritize immediate price movements over long-term fundamental value.