To escape price comparisons in a commoditized market, shift the conversation from cost to risk. Use industry statistics to highlight the expensive, unforeseen problems that occur with cheaper alternatives. Position your higher-priced service as the logical choice to avoid those costly failures.

Related Insights

High prices are not inherently 'expensive'; their affordability is relative to the customer's income. For a high-earning client, a premium purchase can be an impulse buy, equivalent to a fast-food meal for an average person. This reframes pricing from absolute cost to a measure of the buyer's resources.

Startup founders often sell visionary upside, but the majority of customers—especially in enterprise—purchase products to avoid pain or reduce risk (e.g., missing revenue targets). GTM messaging should pivot from the "art of the possible" to risk mitigation to resonate more effectively with buyers.

Introduce a significantly more expensive, highly customized version of your service alongside your main offering. This price anchor makes the actual product you want to sell appear like a fantastic deal, even if it has a high price point, thereby increasing conversion rates.

Prospects who haven't bought your type of solution in a long time lack proper context. They will compare your modern, high-value offering to a cheaper, older, or simpler alternative they understand, leading to sticker shock unless you proactively reframe their perspective.

A blanket price increase is a mistake. Instead, segment your customers. For those deriving high value, use the increase as a trigger for an upsell conversation to a better product. For price-sensitive customers, consider deferring the hike while you work to better demonstrate your value.

Involving prospects in designing their own solution builds a sense of ownership. This "IKEA effect" increases the solution's perceived value, justifying a higher price and neutralizing competitor discounts, even when the final cost is higher.

Proposing an outcome-based pricing model next to a high fixed-fee option forces the negotiation to focus on value, not cost. Even if the customer chooses the fixed fee, they're anchored on a much higher number and are less likely to negotiate it down significantly.

To make a high price seem reasonable, anchor it against a different, more expensive component of the customer's total budget that delivers less long-term value. For example, compare a $100k entertainment package to a $300k flower budget, arguing budget should align with memorability.

Benchmarking against competitors is dangerous because they may have already made pricing mistakes. Furthermore, you might offer superior value under the same service name, meaning you'd be severely underpricing your more comprehensive offering.

Price sensitivity decreases when customers have absolute clarity on what they're buying, when technicians present options with confidence, and when the business consistently provides multiple choices. These three "C's" build perceived value, allowing for higher prices.