An efficient acquisition model uses the gross profit from a new customer's very first transaction to fund the acquisition of the next customer. This transforms customer payments into a direct, self-perpetuating marketing budget, enabling growth without external capital by playing with "house money."

A sophisticated paid acquisition strategy involves spending enough to acquire a customer at a cost equal to their first month's payment. Profitability is achieved in subsequent months and through referrals, enabling aggressive, uncapped scaling by focusing on lifetime value (LTV) over immediate ROI.

By fixing the upfront cash collection, the business generates enough surplus to potentially double sales commissions from $50 to $100 per deal. This elevated pay structure attracts a completely different caliber of salesperson—"an order of magnitude better"—who can close more deals per day, dramatically accelerating growth without adding financial risk.

A one-size-fits-all sales role fails in consumption models. Success requires segmenting the team into specialized roles—new business acquisition, customer onboarding, and account management—each with distinct incentives aligned to their specific function, from initial sign-up to value realization and expansion.

Google's Ads team structured its sales force into three specialized units. The acquisition team was paid on getting a customer to start, the onboarding team on setup success, and the account management team on growing spend beyond a predicted baseline. This aligns incentives with each stage of the customer's consumption journey.

In a consumption model, some growth is organic. Instead of paying reps for this predictable growth, Google used analytical models to forecast a customer's spend trajectory. Account managers were then compensated heavily for exceeding this baseline, rewarding them only for the growth they directly influenced.

Salespeople's biggest frustration with comp plans is being held accountable for outcomes they can't directly influence. This perceived unfairness is a primary driver of attrition, making it critical to align incentives strictly with a seller's direct responsibilities and control.

Unlike perpetual or even subscription models, consumption-based compensation holds sales reps directly responsible for the customer's ongoing product usage. Reps are on the hook to ensure credits are "burned down," effectively merging the roles of sales and customer success and forcing a continuous selling motion.