While AI can easily replicate simple SaaS features (e.g., a server alert), it poses little threat to deeply embedded enterprise systems. The complexity, integrations, and "dark matter" of these platforms create a "hostage" dynamic where ripping them out is impractical, regardless of cloning capabilities.

Unlike the slow denial of SaaS by client-server companies, today's SaaS leaders (e.g., HubSpot, Notion) are rapidly integrating AI. They have an advantage due to vast proprietary data and existing distribution channels, making it harder for new AI-native startups to displace them. The old playbook of a slow incumbent may no longer apply.

Established SaaS companies can defend against AI disruption by leaning into their role as secure, compliant systems of record. While AI can replicate features, it cannot easily replace the years of trust, security protocols, and enterprise-grade support that large companies pay for. Their value shifts from UI to being a trusted database.

The "SaaSpocalypse" narrative misses a key reason large enterprises buy from vendors like Salesforce. It's not just about features, but accountability—like hiring McKinsey, it provides "air cover" and "a throat to choke." This institutional trust is a powerful moat against nascent, AI-generated tools.

AI agents can easily siphon off value from SaaS products priced on per-seat utility by automating tasks previously done by humans (e.g., support tickets). In contrast, deeply embedded systems of record (ERP, CRM) are insulated by career-limiting switching costs and the immense challenge of migrating timeless, critical data.

The 'SaaS-pocalypse' narrative is flawed because IT/SaaS is only 8-12% of enterprise spend. Companies will use powerful AI models to create value in the other 90% of their business—like operations and sales—rather than just rebuilding core software like ERPs or CRMs where the financial upside is limited.

SaaS value lies in its encoded business processes, not its underlying code. AI's primary impact will be forcing SaaS companies to adopt natural language and conversational interfaces to meet new user expectations. The backend complexity remains essential and is not the point of disruption.

Nimble small and medium-sized businesses will increasingly use AI to build custom internal tools, especially for CRM. They will opt to create the 20% of features they actually need, rather than pay for complex, expensive enterprise software where they ignore 80% of the functionality.

SaaS products like Salesforce won't be easily ripped out. The real danger is that new AI agents will operate across all SaaS tools, becoming the primary user interface and capturing the next wave of value. This relegates existing SaaS platforms to a lower, less valuable infrastructure layer.