Endless internal meetings to align stakeholders often feel productive but generate zero real value. They become forums for individuals to 'win' arguments and feel correct. True progress only happens through customer interaction, as internal opinions are worthless until validated externally.

Related Insights

Artist's CPO notes that while frameworks and processes can feel productive, the best product work is often messy and uncomfortable. It involves fighting with stakeholders and making bets on uncertain features rather than fixing known, smaller issues. This contrasts with the idealized view of smooth, process-driven development.

Product managers frequently receive solutions, not problems, from stakeholders. Instead of saying no, the effective approach is to reframe the solution as a set of assumptions and build a discovery backlog to systematically test them. This builds alignment and leads to better outcomes.

Creating elaborate decks and spreadsheets provides a feeling of productivity but is often a sophisticated form of procrastination. It allows founders to delay the core, uncomfortable task of directly engaging potential customers and facing rejection, thereby making no real progress on finding product-market fit.

The debate between being product-led vs. sales-led is a false dichotomy that creates friction. Instead, frame all functions as fundamentally 'customer-driven.' This reframing encourages product teams to view sales requests not as distractions, but as valuable, direct insights into customer needs.

Activities like discovery interviews and seeking design partners often feel productive and validating. However, they are frequently designed to make founders feel comfortable and avoid the difficulty of real selling and deep immersion. True progress comes from uncomfortable, direct actions, not feel-good processes.

Leaders often assume goal alignment. A simple exercise is to ask each team member to articulate the project's goal in their own words. The resulting variety in answers immediately highlights where alignment is needed before work begins, preventing wasted effort on divergent paths.

Gaining genuine team alignment is more complex than getting a superficial agreement. It involves actively surfacing unspoken assumptions and hidden contexts to ensure that when the team agrees, they are all agreeing to the same, fully understood plan.

Effective leaders don't just run faster meetings; they understand that most internal discussions and priorities are irrelevant. The singular focus should be on what the consumer wants. Prioritizing the customer above internal metrics is the ultimate key to focus and speed.

Framing a meeting around "alignment" invites defensiveness and departmental finger-pointing. Calling it a "Go-to-Market Meeting" re-centers the conversation on shared business problems like pipeline and retention, fostering collaborative problem-solving instead of blame.

Vague positive signals ("we're considering prioritizing this") create false hope that wastes months of effort. This "lukewarm demand" is a trap that keeps founders from making necessary pivots or confronting the reality of no true market pull.