Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The surprising 0% change in June's core CPI was driven by noisy, one-off drops in volatile categories like hotel prices (-3%), apparel, and medical care. This cluster of declines created an unusually low reading that doesn't reflect the underlying inflation trend.

Related Insights

The official headline CPI of 2.4% is artificially low due to a measurement error from the October government shutdown. When corrected, the true year-over-year inflation rate is closer to 2.7-2.8%. This means underlying inflation is still hovering near 3%, significantly above the Federal Reserve's 2% target.

The Consumer Price Index shows weak or falling medical care inflation, particularly for health insurance. This is likely a statistical artifact tied to insurer profitability metrics, not a reflection of consumers' actual out-of-pocket expenses. Real-world healthcare costs for households are probably not decreasing as the data suggests.

It's misleading to cite a single inflation number. There's massive deflation in globally competitive sectors like electronics (touched by China and the internet). Simultaneously, hyperinflation exists in state-regulated, protected domestic sectors like US education, healthcare, and housing.

Kevin Warsh advocates for the Dallas Trimmed Mean inflation metric, which excludes extreme price moves. However, this gauge can be misleading. A single significant shock, like oil prices, initially gets excluded but its effects gradually bleed into many other items, causing the metric to lag behind true underlying inflation.

The CPI averages costs across 80,000 items, many of which are non-essentials or luxury goods. This method masks the true, higher inflation rate on basic necessities. For example, while the CPI showed a 72% cost increase over two decades, the actual cost of essentials like housing, food, and healthcare rose by a much larger 97%.

Despite official CPI averaging under 2% from 2010-2020, the actual cost of major assets like homes and stocks exploded. This disconnect shows that government inflation data fails to reflect the reality of eroding purchasing power, which is a key driver of public frustration.

A significant downside miss in the US CPI report failed to move markets long-term. Investors quickly understood the deviation was due to a technical inability to collect data, anticipating a corrective "payback" in the next report, thus rendering the print as noise rather than signal.

Policymakers can maintain market stability as long as inflation volatility remains low, even if the absolute level is above target. A spike in CPI volatility is the true signal that breaks the system, forces a policy response, and makes long-term macro views suddenly relevant.

Focusing on falling oil prices as a sign of easing inflation is simplistic. Leading indicators like the sectoral breakdown of payrolls and a core PPI that has jumped from a 3% to a 5% handle in six months suggest a stickier, more concerning inflation outlook for the Federal Reserve.

Official year-over-year CPI figures are misleading due to a government shutdown's data collection issues. By using an annualized three-month moving average to capture current momentum, analysts find that both core and headline inflation are actually running at a 3% rate, suggesting underlying price pressures are stronger than reported.

June's Flat Core CPI Reading Is Misleading Due to Volatile, Coincidental Declines | RiffOn