Anthropic is making its models available on AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. This multi-cloud approach is a deliberate business strategy to position itself as a neutral infrastructure provider. Unlike competitors who might build competing apps, this signals to customers that Anthropic aims to be a partner, not a competitor.
Related Insights
Instead of competing with OpenAI's mass-market ChatGPT, Anthropic focuses on the enterprise market. By prioritizing safety, reliability, and governance, it targets regulated industries like finance, legal, and healthcare, creating a defensible B2B niche as the "enterprise safety and reliability leader."
OpenAI embraces the 'platform paradox' by selling API access to startups that compete directly with its own apps like ChatGPT. The strategy is to foster a broad ecosystem, believing that enabling competitors is necessary to avoid losing the platform race entirely.
Top AI labs like Anthropic are simultaneously taking massive investments from direct competitors like Microsoft, NVIDIA, Google, and Amazon. This creates a confusing web of reciprocal deals for capital and cloud compute, blurring traditional competitive lines and creating complex interdependencies.
The "AI wrapper" concern is mitigated by a multi-model strategy. A startup can integrate the best models from various providers for different tasks, creating a superior product. A platform like OpenAI is incentivized to only use its own models, creating a durable advantage for the startup.
OpenAI integrated the Model-Centric Protocol (MCP) into its agentic APIs instead of building its own. The decision was driven by Anthropic treating MCP as a truly open standard, complete with a cross-company steering committee, which fostered trust and made adoption easy and pragmatic.
Startups are becoming wary of building on OpenAI's platform due to the significant risk of OpenAI launching competing applications (e.g., Sora for video), rendering their products obsolete. This "platform risk" is pushing developers toward neutral providers like Anthropic or open-source models to protect their businesses.
The choice between open and closed-source AI is not just technical but strategic. For startups, feeding proprietary data to a closed-source provider like OpenAI, which competes across many verticals, creates long-term risk. Open-source models offer "strategic autonomy" and prevent dependency on a potential future rival.
Smaller software companies can't compete with giants like Salesforce or Adobe on an all-in-one basis. They must strategically embrace interoperability and multi-cloud models as a key differentiator. This appeals to customers seeking flexibility and avoiding lock-in to a single vendor's ecosystem.
While AI labs could build competing enterprise apps, the required effort (sales teams, customizations) is massive. For a multi-billion dollar company, the resulting revenue is a rounding error, making it an illogical distraction from their core model-building business.
Companies are becoming wary of feeding their unique data and customer queries into third-party LLMs like ChatGPT. The fear is that this trains a potential future competitor. The trend will shift towards running private, open-source models on their own cloud instances to maintain a competitive moat and ensure data privacy.