After scaling to 300 employees created more problems than it solved, Briq's founder now believes headcount is a poor measure of success. He argues that ARR per employee is the true "flex," promoting capital efficiency and focus over a bloated team size.

The operating model for SaaS has inverted post-2021. Previously, growth came at the cost of declining efficiency ('200% headcount to grow 100%'). The new benchmark is to achieve hyper-efficiency at the margin, demanding teams grow revenue at double the rate of their headcount expansion.

Drawing from the biological principle that cells stop dividing to protect an organism's integrity, companies should moderate growth. Pushing beyond a sustainable rate (e.g., >20% annually) can introduce "mutations" like cultural drift, jeopardizing long-term survival for short-term scale.

By strictly limiting team size, a company is forced to hire only the “best in the world” for each role. This avoids the dilution of talent and communication overhead that plagues growing organizations, aiming to perpetually maintain the high-productivity “mind meld” of a founding team.

Scaling a team is not a linear process. Each time a company's number of employees doubles (e.g., from 5 to 10, then to 20), its operational structure, processes, and even strategy must be completely re-evaluated. This forces a difficult transition from generalized roles to specialized functions.

If hiring more people isn't increasing output, it's likely because you're adding 'ammunition' (individual contributors) without adding 'barrels' (the key people or projects that enable work). To scale effectively, you must increase the number of independent workstreams, not just the headcount within them.

Contradicting the common startup goal of scaling headcount, the founders now actively question how small they can keep their team. They see a direct link between adding people, increasing process, and slowing down, leveraging a small, elite team as a core part of their high-velocity strategy.

Gamma's CEO resists the pressure to scale headcount aggressively, arguing that doubling the team size does not guarantee double the speed. He believes a smaller, more agile team can change direction faster, which is more valuable than raw speed in a rapidly evolving market.

Don't hire more reps until your current team hits its productivity target (e.g., generating 3x their OTE). Scaling headcount before proving the unit economics of your sales motion is a recipe for inefficient growth, missed forecasts, and a bloated cost structure.