Once ad copy proves to resonate with a target market, it may not need to be changed. A multi-million dollar ad campaign ran for a full year with the same copy, focusing solely on testing and rotating new creative visuals to maintain effectiveness and reach new audiences.
Stop spending money to test ads. Instead, publish a high volume of organic social content and identify what naturally gains traction. Then, convert only those proven, high-performing pieces into paid ads. This model dramatically lowers customer acquisition costs by ensuring ad spend only scales winners.
Chick-fil-A spent millions trying to replace its long-running cow campaign, but research always confirmed "the market likes it." Effective marketing sticks with what demonstrably works, even if it feels repetitive or uncreative to the internal team. Don't change for the sake of change.
The most effective long-term campaigns use "disguised repetition"—keeping core brand assets consistent while introducing fresh creative elements, like Aldi's Kevin the Carrot—to build memory structures without causing audience fatigue.
Contrary to the belief that ads quickly wear out, strong creative often performs better with repeated exposure. This concept of "wear in" justifies patience, allowing a new campaign to build familiarity and emotional connection with the audience, as stories grow resonance over time.
With Meta's Andromeda algorithm automating audience targeting, the primary reason for poor ad performance is no longer incorrect targeting settings. Wasted money is now almost exclusively a result of insufficient or non-diverse creative, making creative strategy the most critical component of a successful campaign.
By re-running a successful past Christmas ad, Amazon guaranteed an emotional hit, avoided creative fatigue, and reallocated the entire production budget to media spend for a bigger share of voice. This "bake your cakes longer" strategy challenges the industry's obsession with newness.
Data shows that brand-building ads rarely suffer from "wear out." Amazon successfully reran their "Sledging Grannies" ad two years later, and it tested with the exact same effectiveness, proving that great creative has a long shelf life.
The common marketing belief in ad "wear out" is wrong, as familiarity breeds contentment, not contempt. Consequently, marketers often pull their advertising campaigns right at the point where repetition is making them most effective.
Familiarity breeds contentment, not contempt. The 'Mere Exposure Effect' shows that repeated exposure to a stimulus makes us feel more positive towards it. This explains why consistent campaigns outperform those that frequently change creative. The performance gap between effective, consistent campaigns and inconsistent ones widens dramatically over time, creating a compounding advantage.
A key insight from analysis of Effie and System1 data is that brands get bored of their creative work long before audiences do. As strategist Mark Ritson highlighted, pulling successful campaigns prematurely forfeits the significant long-term value of "compound creativity."