Widespread economic fear from debt and inflation creates a national 'fight or flight' mode. This anxiety is emotionally taxing, so people convert it to anger. Politicians exploit this by providing specific targets for that anger, mobilizing a populist base.

The phenomenon of pregnant women taking Tylenol to spite Trump illustrates how intense dislike for a political figure can lead to irrational, self-harming actions. This highlights the danger of being trapped by emotions and the importance of cultivating a healthy skepticism of one's own reactive impulses.

Oxford naming "rage bait" its word of the year signifies that intentionally provoking anger for online engagement is no longer a fringe tactic but a recognized, mainstream strategy. This reflects a maturation of the attention economy, where emotional manipulation has become a codified tool for content creators and digital marketers.

Algorithms optimize for engagement, and outrage is highly engaging. This creates a vicious cycle where users are fed increasingly polarizing content, which makes them angrier and more engaged, further solidifying their radical views and deepening societal divides.

In a study where people could self-stimulate emotions, they chose anger. This suggests anger is not just a reaction but a preferred state because it replaces fear and uncertainty with a clear sense of righteousness and a simple path to action, even if destructive.

This psychological mechanism flips a switch, intensifying love for one's in-group while enabling murderous hatred for an out-group. It recasts political rivals as existential threats, making violence seem not just acceptable, but morally necessary for the group's survival.

A neuroscience study revealed that when subjects could choose an emotion to have stimulated in their brains, they universally chose anger. This is because anger provides a feeling of clarity and purpose, eliminating the uncomfortable states of anxiety and uncertainty that people hate.

Anger is the emotion people are most likely to self-stimulate because it provides a potent neurological shortcut. It replaces anxiety and uncertainty with a feeling of clarity, energy, and focus, making it a tempting but dangerous short-term solution to complex problems.

Focusing on which political side is "crazier" misses the point. The fundamental danger is the psychological process of tribalism itself. It simplifies complex issues into "us vs. them," impairs rational thought, and inevitably leads to extremism on all sides.