The primary threat to the high-yield market isn't a wave of corporate defaults, but rather a reversion of the compressed risk premium that investors demand. This premium has been historically low, and a return to normal levels presents a significant valuation risk, even if fundamentals remain stable.

Contrary to the belief that hot credit markets encourage high leverage, data shows high-yield borrowers currently have leverage levels around four times, the lowest in two decades. This statistical reality contrasts sharply with gloomy market sentiment driven by anecdotal defaults, suggesting underlying strength in the asset class.

Default rates are not uniform. High-yield bonds are low due to a 2020 "cleansing." Leveraged loans show elevated defaults due to higher rates. Private credit defaults are masked but may be as high as 6%, indicated by "bad PIK" amendments, suggesting hidden stress.

The CCC-rated segment of the high-yield market should not be treated as a simple down-in-quality allocation. Instead, it's a "stock picker's" environment where opportunities are found in specific, idiosyncratic situations with high conviction, such as a turnaround story or a mispriced part of a company's capital structure.

The massive ~$1.5 trillion in debt financing required for AI infrastructure will create a supply glut in the investment-grade (IG) bond market. This technical pressure, despite solid company fundamentals, makes IG bonds less attractive. High-yield (HY) bonds are favored as they don't face this supply headwind and default rates are expected to fall.

Judging the credit market by its overall index spread is misleading. The significant gap between the tightest and widest spreads (high dispersion) reveals that the market is rewarding quality and punishing uncertainty. This makes individual credit selection far more important than a top-down market view.

The modern high-yield market is structurally different from its past. It's now composed of higher-quality issuers and has a shorter duration profile. While this limits potential upside returns compared to historical cycles, it also provides a cushion, capping the potential downside risk for investors.

A significant shift in corporate finance strategy has occurred: companies no longer universally strive for an investment-grade (IG) rating. Many firms, including 'fallen angels' downgraded from IG, are content to operate with a high-yield rating, finding the higher borrowing costs acceptable for their business models.

A surge in investment-grade bond issuance to fund AI capital expenditures will insulate the high-yield market. This technical factor is expected to drive high-yield bond outperformance versus higher-quality corporate bonds, which will face supply pressure.