Recent inflation was primarily driven by fiscal spending, not the bank-lending credit booms of the 1970s. The Fed’s main tool—raising interest rates—is designed to curb bank lending. This creates a mismatch where the Fed is slowing the private sector to counteract a problem created by the public sector.

When national debt grows too large, an economy enters "fiscal dominance." The central bank loses its ability to manage the economy, as raising rates causes hyperinflation to cover debt payments while lowering them creates massive asset bubbles, leaving no good options.

Due to massive government debt, the Fed's tools work paradoxically. Raising rates increases the deficit via higher interest payments, which is stimulative. Cutting rates is also inherently stimulative. The Fed is no longer controlling inflation but merely choosing the path through which it occurs.

When government spending is massive ("fiscal dominance"), the Federal Reserve's ability to manage the economy via interest rates is neutralized. The government's deficit spending is so large that it dictates economic conditions, rendering rate cuts ineffective at solving structural problems.

Over the past few years, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve have been working at cross-purposes. While the Fed attempted to remove liquidity from the system via quantitative tightening, the Treasury effectively reinjected it by drawing down its reverse repo facility and focusing issuance on T-bills.

Large, ongoing fiscal deficits are now the primary driver of the U.S. economy, a factor many macro analysts are missing. This sustained government spending creates a higher floor for economic activity and asset prices, rendering traditional monetary policy indicators less effective and making the economy behave more like a fiscally dominant state.

A new market dynamic has emerged where Fed rate cuts cause long-term bond yields to rise, breaking historical patterns. This anomaly is driven by investor concerns over fiscal imbalances and high national debt, meaning monetary easing no longer has its traditional effect on the back end of the yield curve.

Higher interest rates on government debt are creating a significant income stream for seniors, who hold a large amount of cash-like assets. This cohort's increased spending power—either for themselves or passed down to younger generations—acts as a counterintuitive fiscal stimulus, offsetting the intended tightening effects of the Fed's policy.

The U.S. government's debt is so large that the Federal Reserve is trapped. Raising interest rates would trigger a government default, while cutting them would further inflate the 'everything bubble.' Either path leads to a systemic crisis, a situation economists call 'fiscal dominance.'