Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

ADCs more frequently cause "oligoprogression," where most metastatic sites respond while only one or two progress. This allows for treating the progressing lesion with local therapy (e.g., radiotherapy) while continuing the systemic ADC, rather than abandoning an otherwise effective treatment.

Related Insights

A defining characteristic of antibody-drug conjugates is not just their response rate, but their remarkable duration of response. Patients who respond often maintain that response for a significantly longer period than with standard chemotherapy, a benefit likely attributable to the ADC's effect on the tumor microenvironment.

The TROPION-PanTumor01 study showed that patients who progressed on the TROP2-ADC sacituzumab govitecan still achieved responses to a second TROP2-ADC, Dato-DXD. This suggests that targeting the same antigen with a different payload can overcome initial resistance, informing future treatment sequencing.

For patients with otherwise well-controlled disease who develop isolated oligoprogression in the brain, evidence suggests a better survival outcome from adding local therapy (like SRS) and continuing the current effective systemic therapy, rather than switching the systemic regimen entirely.

In metastatic breast cancer, approximately one-third of patients are unable to proceed to a second line of therapy due to disease progression or declining performance status. This high attrition rate argues for using the most effective agents, such as ADCs, in the first-line setting.

Rather than moving through distinct lines of therapy, a future strategy could involve an "ADC switch." When a patient progresses on an ADC-IO combination, the IO backbone would remain while the ADC is swapped for one with a different, non-cross-resistant mechanism, adapting the treatment in real-time.

Emerging data shows that a second ADC, particularly one with the same payload, often has limited efficacy. This suggests clinicians must be highly strategic in selecting the first ADC, as it may be their most impactful opportunity for this class of drugs.

For patients on immunotherapy who develop an isolated site of progression while other lesions remain controlled, a practical strategy is to continue the checkpoint inhibitor and treat the single progressive site with localized therapy, such as radiation.

As multiple effective Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) become available, the primary clinical challenge is no longer *if* they work, but *how* to use them best. Key unanswered questions involve optimal sequencing, dosing for treatment versus maintenance, and overall length of therapy, mirroring issues already seen in breast cancer.

Counterintuitively, data suggests that prostate cancer patients who progressed on PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy can still achieve deep responses to a PSMA-targeting ADC. This may be because resistant tumors become more proliferative, increasing their sensitivity to the ADC's cytotoxic topoisomerase payload, which has a different mechanism of action.

When patients progress on an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), the resistance is frequently due to the tumor becoming resistant to the chemotherapy payload (e.g., a topoisomerase inhibitor). This is more common than the tumor losing the surface target, which critically impacts the sequencing of subsequent ADCs.