A subtle but practice-changing takeaway from the COMPETE study is that patients did not receive concurrent somatostatin analogs. This suggests that continuing this supportive therapy may not be essential for patients with non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors undergoing PRRT, potentially simplifying treatment and reducing patient burden.

Following high response rates to systemic therapies like EV Pembro, using radiation for bladder preservation is now questioned. It may constitute overtreatment by radiating a now cancer-free organ, while providing no benefit for the systemic micrometastases that are the primary driver of mortality.

Clinicians are concerned about the overuse of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for oligoprogressive disease, a practice dubbed 'Pokemon' (gotta catch 'em all). This approach of sequentially radiating new lesions can delay the start of more effective systemic therapies and is not considered a standard of care.

With pirtobrutinib, time to next treatment often exceeds progression-free survival. This discrepancy exists because disease progression is frequently slow and asymptomatic, meaning clinicians do not need to switch therapies immediately upon seeing radiographic changes, allowing for longer treatment duration.

An expert argues the path to curing metastatic cancer may mirror pediatric ALL's history: combining all highly active drugs upfront. Instead of sequencing treatments after failure, the focus should be on powerful initial regimens that eradicate cancer, even if it means higher initial toxicity.

With new CNS-active drugs dramatically improving survival after a brain metastasis diagnosis, some experts are now advocating for routine screening brain MRIs in high-risk patients. The goal is to detect asymptomatic lesions early, potentially preventing catastrophic neurologic events like seizures.

Retrospective data reveals a four-fold increase in radiation necrosis when antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) like TDXD or TDM-1 are given within weeks of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Clinicians should pause ADC treatment for at least one cycle around SRS to mitigate this serious complication.

The common practice of switching from one ARPI to another upon disease progression is now considered ineffective for most patients. With the advent of proven alternatives like chemotherapy and lutetium, using an "ARPI switch" as the sole control arm in clinical trials is no longer ethically or scientifically sound.

In metastatic breast cancer, approximately one-third of patients are unable to proceed to a second line of therapy due to disease progression or declining performance status. This high attrition rate argues for using the most effective agents, such as ADCs, in the first-line setting.