Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

For decades, legacy media like ESPN believed their platform was what made stars famous. The success of talent like Bill Simmons and Kara Swisher after leaving proves that top personalities can now build portable audiences that follow them, shifting power from the institution to the individual.

Related Insights

The New York Times and similar institutions lose their biggest personalities because they operate with a traditional salary structure. They don't compensate talent based on the specific revenue a star's podcast or column generates, creating a massive pay gap that incentivizes top performers to leave and build independent businesses.

Media companies face a dilemma: allowing on-air talent to engage in new media like podcasts enhances relevance, but it also empowers them to build personal brands that directly compete with the network for audience attention, loyalty, and ultimately, revenue.

In the attention economy, high-paid talent at legacy companies like CNN are cost centers on a bloated P&L. By using platforms like YouTube or Substack, these individuals can become high-margin businesses, capturing value directly from their audience instead of a corporate employer.

Spotify's Netflix deal, featuring 14 shows from Bill Simmons' The Ringer, highlights a superior media strategy. Building a platform that cultivates many creators ('king making') is more resilient and valuable than relying on a few individual superstars ('kings') who may eventually leave.

The economics of media have flipped. Previously, the 'means of production' (studios, networks) captured most value, giving talent ~15% of revenue. Now, with democratized platforms like podcasting, the means of production are commoditized, and top talent can command 70% or more of the revenue.

As legacy media giants merge and cut costs, they alienate top talent. This creates a prime opportunity for agile competitors, like Netflix or Substack creators, to hire iconic journalists and producers who are now looking for an exit, accelerating the shift of influence away from established brands.

Former BBC CEO Deborah Turness warns that large media brands must learn from the creator economy. She urges them to stop "managing" the news and instead empower talent to build authentic, direct relationships with audiences, mirroring platforms like Substack and YouTube.

Gus Wenner views personality-driven creators as the modern embodiment of legendary journalists like Hunter S. Thompson. This talent-first approach, once central to iconic media brands, has been lost by many traditional publishers but is key to winning in the current landscape where personalities build the brand.

Platforms enable top creators to leave media companies and capture all their value, breaking the traditional model where stars implicitly subsidize the development of the next generation. This erodes the organizational structure for mentorship, collaboration, and growth.

The media landscape has fundamentally changed. Value is no longer concentrated in institutional brands like the New York Times. Instead, it has shifted to individual, 'non-fungible' writers who can now build their own brands and businesses on platforms like Substack.

The 'Person vs. Platform' Debate Is Over; Top Talent Now Controls the Audience | RiffOn