Companies can either augment existing processes with AI for incremental efficiency (e.g., co-pilots) or completely redesign workflows. While augmentation is common, the most transformative value and disruptive business models will emerge from a clean-sheet redesign of how work is done.

Drawing a parallel to the slow adoption of PCs in the 90s, Boris Churney argues companies won't see AI productivity boosts by simply layering it onto old workflows. The biggest benefits come from placing AI at the core of the business and redesigning processes around its capabilities, eliminating old bottlenecks entirely.

A McKinsey report identifies a small group of "AI high performers" (6% of companies) that achieve significant impact. Their key differentiator is fundamentally redesigning business workflows around AI, rather than simply augmenting current tasks.

The historical adoption of electricity in factories shows that true productivity gains came from redesigning the factory floor, not simply replacing steam engines. Similarly, companies must fundamentally re-engineer processes around AI to unlock its transformative potential.

The greatest value of AI isn't just automating tasks within your current process. Leaders should use AI to fundamentally question the workflow itself, asking it to suggest entirely new, more efficient, and innovative ways to achieve business goals.

True productivity gains from AI will mirror the adoption of electricity. Early factories that just replaced steam engines with electric motors saw little benefit. The revolution happened when they completely redesigned the factory floor around the new technology. Similarly, companies must reimagine entire workflows around human-AI collaboration.

The true power of AI is unlocked by adopting an "AI First" approach. This means completely redesigning workflows with AI at the core, rather than simply using AI to accelerate existing processes. This shifts employees' roles from performing tasks to managing the AI agents that do the work.

AI does more than speed up existing work. It unbundles traditional workflows, jobs, and organizations, allowing for fundamentally new structures to emerge. The real value is in this "reshuffle," not in simple efficiency gains on today's work.

Just as electricity's impact was muted until factory floors were redesigned, AI's productivity gains will be modest if we only use it to replace old tools (e.g., as a better Google). Significant economic impact will only occur when companies fundamentally restructure their operations and workflows to leverage AI's unique capabilities.