Instead of corrupting individuals, fame, success, and money act as magnifiers, exposing a person's core character. This reframes the common belief that power changes people, suggesting it merely reveals what was always there.
Related Insights
After achieving financial success, Donald Spann observed a frustrating shift: his opinions, even on non-business topics, were suddenly valued more by friends and peers. The content of his advice hadn't changed, but the perceived authority granted by wealth altered its reception completely.
Contrary to the popular belief that power corrupts, research suggests it acts as an amplifier. If a person is already "pro-social"—oriented towards helping others—power can increase their empathy and effectiveness. If they are selfish, power will magnify those negative traits.
Money acts as a "non-specific amplifier," much like alcohol or power. It doesn't fundamentally change your character but magnifies your existing traits—both good and bad. Insecurities become more pronounced, generosity becomes super-generosity, and a "micro asshole" becomes a "mega asshole."
Tying self-worth to professional achievements is a trap. True validation comes from your character and how you handle adversity—things invisible to the public. Detaching self-worth from outcomes creates an unshakeable sense of self.
More money acts as a multiplier for your existing emotional state. For a person who is already happy and content, wealth can enhance their life. However, for someone who is fundamentally unhappy or unfulfilled, more money will not solve their core problems and may even exacerbate their misery.
Chasing achievements like money or status won't fix a lack of self-worth. Success acts as a magnifying glass on your internal state. If you are insecure, more success will only make you feel more insecure. True fulfillment comes from inner work, not external validation.
Successful individuals earn 'idiosyncrasy credit,' allowing them to deviate from social norms. However, observers often make the mistake of assuming these eccentricities were necessary for success. In reality, these behaviors are often tolerated or hidden until success provides the freedom to express them.
We all have an internal "thermostat" for success. If we deviate too far from this setting, our subconscious mind pulls us back to our comfort zone. Lasting change requires recalibrating this core identity, not just changing actions or setting goals.
When eulogized, a person's career accomplishments are footnotes. The core of their legacy is their character—how they behaved and treated others—and their service. This reality should inform how we prioritize our daily actions, focusing on behavior over status or material success.
The solution to the "too ambitious" problem seen in corporate scandals like Enron isn't to dial down ambition. Instead, it's to channel that powerful drive towards positive, moral outcomes. This reframes ambition from a potential vice into a potent force for good when given the right direction.