Judging an AI's capability by its base model alone is misleading. Its effectiveness is significantly amplified by surrounding tooling and frameworks, like developer environments. A good tool harness can make a decent model outperform a superior model that lacks such support.
Related Insights
Simply offering the latest model is no longer a competitive advantage. True value is created in the system built around the model—the system prompts, tools, and overall scaffolding. This 'harness' is what optimizes a model's performance for specific tasks and delivers a superior user experience.
AI platforms using the same base model (e.g., Claude) can produce vastly different results. The key differentiator is the proprietary 'agent' layer built on top, which gives the model specific tools to interact with code (read, write, edit files). A superior agent leads to superior performance.
People overestimate AI's 'out-of-the-box' capability. Successful AI products require extensive work on data pipelines, context tuning, and continuous model training based on output. It's not a plug-and-play solution that magically produces correct responses.
Just as standardized tests fail to capture a student's full potential, AI benchmarks often don't reflect real-world performance. The true value comes from the 'last mile' ingenuity of productization and workflow integration, not just raw model scores, which can be misleading.
Building an AI application is becoming trivial and fast ("under 10 minutes"). The true differentiator and the most difficult part is embedding deep domain knowledge into the prompts. The AI needs to be taught *what* to look for, which requires human expertise in that specific field.
While choosing a leading vendor is important, the ultimate success of an AI agent hinges on the deep, continuous training you invest. An average tool with excellent, hands-on training will outperform a top-tier tool with zero effort put into its refinement.
The effectiveness of an AI system isn't solely dependent on the model's sophistication. It's a collaboration between high-quality training data, the model itself, and the contextual understanding of how to apply both to solve a real-world problem. Neglecting data or context leads to poor outcomes.
The pace of AI model improvement is faster than the ability to ship specific tools. By creating lower-level, generalizable tools, developers build a system that automatically becomes more powerful and adaptable as the underlying AI gets smarter, without requiring re-engineering.
The belief that a single, god-level foundation model would dominate has proven false. Horowitz points to successful AI applications like Cursor, which uses 13 different models. This shows that value lies in the complex orchestration and design at the application layer, not just in having the largest single model.
The perceived limits of today's AI are not inherent to the models themselves but to our failure to build the right "agentic scaffold" around them. There's a "model capability overhang" where much more potential can be unlocked with better prompting, context engineering, and tool integrations.
