More capital isn't always better. An excess of funding can lead to a lack of focus, wasteful spending, and a reluctance to make tough choices—a form of moral hazard. It's crucial to match the amount of capital to a founder's ability to deploy it effectively without losing discipline.

One of the biggest threats to a company's focus is a bored founder. Convinced of their own intelligence, they chase new, shiny opportunities, which dilutes resources and distracts from the core mission that made them successful in the first place.

A founder's deep, intrinsic passion for their company's mission is critical for long-term success. Even with a sound business model, a lack of genuine care leads to burnout and failure when challenges arise. Leaders cannot sustain success in areas they consider a distraction from their "real" passion, like AGI research versus product monetization.

Entrepreneurs often jump between projects, fearing their current one won't succeed in the long run. This is a fatal trap. According to Sam Parr, true focus, while difficult, is the necessary price for an outsized outcome and increases the likelihood of success. Diversification is for preserving wealth, not creating it.

Frame your initial angel investments as a sunk cost, like business school tuition. Instead of optimizing for immediate financial returns, focus on building relationships, acquiring skills, and developing a strong reputation. This long-term mindset reduces pressure and leads to better, unforeseen opportunities down the line.

Beyond product-market fit, there is "Founder-Capital Fit." Some founders thrive with infinite capital, while for others it creates a moral hazard, leading to a loss of focus and an inability to make hard choices. An investor's job is to discern which type of founder they're backing before deploying capital that could inadvertently ruin the company.

New VCs often rush to make deals to prove themselves, but this leads to a portfolio of mediocre companies. These investments consume a disproportionate amount of time and energy, leaving no bandwidth to pursue the truly exceptional, career-making opportunities that may appear later.

The most fulfilling and effective angel investments involve more than capital. Founders benefit most from investors who act as operators, offering hands-on help and staying involved in the business. This approach is more rewarding and can lead to better outcomes than passive check-writing.

Scott Galloway actively avoids angel investing, calling it the "worst part of the capital structure." He argues that with only one in seven deals ever providing a return, high dilution risk, and a massive time commitment, it's an inefficient way to deploy capital unless it's for a friend and the money is considered a write-off.