Leadership actively evaluates the maturity of core technologies like Gemini to decide when to "double down" on specific applications, such as infusing AI into learning science. This treats timing not as a passive deadline, but as a core management principle for pausing or accelerating projects.
Related Insights
Allocate resources strategically to ensure both short-term stability and long-term innovation. Dedicate 70% of effort to the core business (1-2 year impact), 20% to riskier medium-term bets (3-5 years), and 10% to high-risk moonshots.
Large enterprises navigate a critical paradox with new technology like AI. Moving too slowly cedes the market and leads to irrelevance. However, moving too quickly without clear direction or a focus on feasibility results in wasting millions of dollars on failed initiatives.
Unlike traditional software development, AI-native founders avoid long-term, deterministic roadmaps. They recognize that AI capabilities change so rapidly that the most effective strategy is to maximize what's possible *now* with fast iteration cycles, rather than planning for a speculative future.
Mark Zuckerberg has structured his top AI research group, TBD, with a "no deadlines" policy. He argues that for true research with many unknown problems, imposing artificial timelines leads to sub-optimal outcomes. The goal is to allow the team to pursue the "full thing" without constraints, fostering deeper innovation.
Google has shifted from a perceived "fear to ship" by adopting a "relentless shipping" mindset for its AI products. The company now views public releases as a crucial learning mechanism, recognizing that real-world user interaction and even adversarial use are vital for rapid improvement.
In the fast-moving AI sector, quarterly planning is obsolete. Leaders should adopt a weekly reassessment cadence and define "boundaries for experimentation" rather than rigid goals. This fosters unexpected discoveries that are essential for staying ahead of competitors who can leapfrog you in weeks.
In a rapidly evolving field like AI, long-term planning is futile as "what you knew three months ago isn't true right now." Maintain agility by focusing on short-term, customer-driven milestones and avoid roadmaps that extend beyond a single quarter.
By embedding product teams directly within the research organization, Google creates a tight feedback loop. Instead of receiving models "over the wall," product and research teams co-develop them, aligning technical capabilities with customer needs from the start.
The most critical window for staying ahead in AI is the first 24 hours after a new technology is released. ElevenLabs mobilizes its small, nimble teams to begin integration immediately to capitalize on the moment, believing this is the key to being ahead.
While a tight product-research link is beneficial, it creates a management challenge where teams get so excited about implementation they neglect the next big research question. The research leader's role includes making the difficult judgment call to shift focus back toward long-term discovery, even amid product success.
