Shifting the perspective from healthcare as a cost to an investment in productivity reveals its true economic value. Dr. Oz calculates that enabling the average American to work just one year longer adds $3 trillion to the U.S. economy.

Rapidly aging populations in China, Japan, and Korea are creating a broad 'longevity economy'. Investment drivers extend beyond traditional healthcare and pharma into sectors like affordable healthy foods, specialized wealth management, and pension system reforms, creating a comprehensive new consumer and financial market.

General Catalyst's CEO highlights a core flaw in healthcare: insurance providers don't reimburse for longevity or preventative care because customers frequently switch plans, preventing insurers from capturing long-term ROI. The first company to solve this misalignment and make longevity "financeable" will unlock a massive market.

A $2,000 preventative injection like a PCSK9 inhibitor sounds expensive. However, its cost is likely justified when calculated against the massive societal and individual expense of future medical bills, plus the economic value of additional healthy, productive years.

Contrary to the ageist view that an older population drains resources, healthy older individuals represent a massive, untapped asset. Their accumulated wisdom, experience, and wealth are a form of "gold" that society must learn to mine by creating opportunities rather than pushing them aside.

The Orphan Drug Act successfully incentivized R&D for rare diseases. A similar policy framework is needed for common, age-related diseases. Despite their massive potential markets, these indications suffer from extremely high failure rates and costs. A new incentive structure could de-risk development and align commercial goals with the enormous societal need for longevity.

Beyond tackling fatal diseases to increase lifespan, a new wave of biotech innovation focuses on "health span"—the period of life lived in high quality. This includes developing treatments for conditions often dismissed as aging, such as frailty, vision loss, and hearing decline, aiming to improve wellbeing in later decades.

A major transformation has occurred in longevity science, particularly in the last eight years. The conversation has moved away from claims of radical life extension towards the more valuable goal of increasing "healthspan"—the period of healthy, functional life. This represents a significant and recent shift in scientific consensus.

The common aversion to living to 120 stems from assuming extra years will be spent in poor health. The goal of longevity science is to extend *healthspan*—the period of healthy, mobile life—which reframes the debate from merely adding years to adding high-quality life.