To create a distinctive retro UI, Cursor's designer researched historical UI patterns and assets—a process he calls "UI archeology." This provided specific constraints to the AI, preventing it from generating generic designs and allowing him to "paint" a unique style over standard components.

Related Insights

Many users blame AI tools for generic designs when the real issue is a poorly defined initial prompt. Using a preparatory GPT to outline user goals, needs, and flows ensures a strong starting point, preventing the costly and circular revisions that stem from a vague beginning.

To design a SaaS dashboard, the host provided Gemini 3.0 with two distinct references: a clean UI from Dribbble for layout and a physical Teenage Engineering product for button inspiration. This blending of digital and physical design cues resulted in a unique and more tactile interface.

Projects like Rio OS, which recreate old operating systems, show that fundamental UI concepts—windows, text editors, icons—are timeless. Despite massive technological leaps, we are still using the same core patterns established decades ago. This suggests that lasting design focuses on these enduring interaction models rather than fleeting trends.

A custom instruction defines your design system's principles (e.g., spacing, color), but it's most effective when paired with a pre-defined component library (e.g., buttons). The instruction tells the AI *how* to arrange things, while the library provides the consistent building blocks, yielding more coherent results.

The host successfully prompted Google's Gemini 3.0 to redesign his personal website in the style of Microsoft XP. This demonstrates that AI can move beyond generic templates by leveraging unconventional, nostalgic design languages, creating a memorable user experience that stands out.

Claude Opus 4.5 allows users to install a specific 'front-end design skill' with two simple prompts. This non-obvious feature instructs the model to avoid typical AI design clichés and generate production-grade interfaces, resulting in significantly more unique and professional-looking UIs.

Leverage AI as an idea generator rather than a final execution tool. By prompting for multiple "vastly different" options—like hover effects—you can review a range of possibilities, select a promising direction, and then iterate, effectively using AI to explore your own taste.

To avoid generic, 'purple AI slop' UIs, create a custom design system for your AI tool. Use 'reverse prompting': feed an LLM like ChatGPT screenshots of a target app (e.g., Uber) and ask it to extrapolate the foundational design system (colors, typography). Use this output as a custom instruction.

The true creative potential for AI in design isn't generating safe, average outputs based on training data. Instead, AI should act as a tool to help designers interpolate between different styles and push them into novel, underexplored aesthetic territories, fostering originality rather than conformity.

AI coding tools generate functional but often generic designs. The key to creating a beautiful, personalized application is for the human to act as a creative director. This involves rejecting default outputs, finding specific aesthetic inspirations, and guiding the AI to implement a curated human vision.