As AI coding agents generate vast amounts of code, the most tedious part of a developer's job shifts from writing code to reviewing it. This creates a new product opportunity: building tools that help developers validate and build confidence in AI-written code, making the review process less of a chore.

Claude Skills aren't limited to natural language instructions; they can reference and execute Python scripts. This enables developers to enforce consistency for technical tasks like data cleaning or validation, preventing the variability that occurs when the LLM generates code on its own.

AI code editors can be tasked with high-level goals like "fix lint errors." The agent will then independently run necessary commands, interpret the output, apply code changes, and re-run the commands to verify the fix, all without direct human intervention or step-by-step instructions.

Go beyond static AI code analysis. After an AI like Codex automatically flags a high-confidence issue in a GitHub pull request, developers can reply directly in a comment, "Hey, Codex, can you fix it?" The agent will then attempt to fix the issue it found.

To overcome the challenge of reviewing AI-generated code, have different LLMs like Claude and Codex review the code. Then, use a "peer review" prompt that forces the primary LLM to defend its choices or fix the issues raised by its "peers." This adversarial process catches more bugs and improves overall code quality.

When an AI tool makes a mistake, treat it as a learning opportunity for the system. Ask the AI to reflect on why it failed, such as a flaw in its system prompt or tooling. Then, update the underlying documentation and prompts to prevent that specific class of error from happening again in the future.

Configure an AI stop hook to not only run quality checks but also to automatically commit the changes if all checks pass. This creates a fully automated loop: the AI generates code, the hook validates it, and if it's clean, it's committed to the repository with a generated message.

To maximize an AI agent's effectiveness, establish foundational software engineering practices like typed languages, linters, and tests. These tools provide the necessary context and feedback loops for the AI to identify, understand, and correct its own mistakes, making it more resilient.

When an AI model makes the same undesirable output two or three times, treat it as a signal. Create a custom rule or prompt instruction that explicitly codifies the desired behavior. This trains the AI to avoid that specific mistake in the future, improving consistency over time.