The introduction of ADCs into frontline ovarian cancer treatment creates a new challenge: conflicting biomarkers. A patient's tumor might be positive for both HER2 (an ADC target) and a BRCA mutation (a PARP inhibitor target), forcing clinicians to choose between two effective targeted therapies without clear guidance.

A novel strategy involves combining antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with PARP inhibitors. This approach could potentially overcome the need for a germline BRCA mutation, significantly broadening the patient population that could benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

The Begonia trial showed an ~80% response rate by combining an ADC (Dato-DXD) with immunotherapy (Durvalumab) in first-line metastatic TNBC patients, 87% of whom were PD-L1 negative. This suggests ADCs, through immunogenic cell death, may create an immune-responsive environment, expanding IO benefit beyond the traditional biomarker.

Contrary to the standard 'TKI-first' approach for driver mutations, a study in MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC suggests a different strategy. Patients with high PD-L1 expression appeared to have better outcomes with first-line chemoimmunotherapy, reserving the targeted therapy for later. This challenges the conventional wisdom of prioritizing the driver mutation over immunotherapy biomarkers in this specific subgroup.

For TNBC patients with a germline BRCA mutation, a completely chemotherapy-free neoadjuvant regimen using an oral PARP inhibitor is showing impressive pathologic complete response rates, potentially transforming the treatment paradigm for this genetically-defined subgroup.

For de novo metastatic, PD-L1 positive TNBC patients with a BRCA mutation, experts prefer an ADC with immunotherapy over a PARP inhibitor. This choice is driven by the potential for longer-lasting responses with the ADC/IO combination, even though PARP inhibitors directly target the underlying genetic mutation.

A nuanced approach to PARP inhibitors involves reserving combinations for BRCA2 patients with clear, aggressive clinical features like high-volume disease or liver metastases. This strategy balances potent efficacy against toxicity for a molecularly defined but clinically heterogeneous group, avoiding overtreatment of those with more indolent disease.

Experts are more cautious about sequencing ADCs back-to-back in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) compared to less aggressive subtypes. A sobering 50% of TNBC patients do not receive treatment beyond the first line, making it critical to use the most effective therapy upfront rather than saving options for later.

In high-risk, BRCA-positive patients eligible for both, clinicians favor giving a PARP inhibitor first. The rationale is based on established survival data, shorter one-year duration, and emerging biological evidence suggesting BRCA2-mutated tumors may be resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitors due to concurrent RB gene loss.