An expert who initially viewed CELMoDs as incremental improvements now considers them fundamentally different. The new litmus test for future myeloma trials will be tracking prior patient exposure to CELMoDs like iberdomide, just as they track prior IMiD exposure today, cementing their status as a distinct therapeutic category.
Related Insights
While CELMoDs frequently cause neutropenia, this effect is most pronounced in early cycles and manageable with growth factors. This contrasts sharply with the persistent, quality-of-life-impairing non-hematologic side effects of lenalidomide, such as rash and severe fatigue. This trade-off results in a significantly better long-term tolerability profile for patients.
The field of multiple myeloma has transformed from having few treatments to an abundance of effective drugs. The primary clinical challenge is no longer finding a therapy that works, but rather determining the optimal sequence and combination of available options, highlighting a unique form of market maturity.
Pathways like integrins have long been of interest but lacked effective therapeutic approaches. The advent of new technologies, such as antibody-drug conjugates and checkpoint inhibitors, has created opportunities to re-explore these older targets with potent, modern drugs, breathing new life into decades-old research.
When a highly effective therapy like EV Pembro was approved for 'cisplatin ineligible' patients, the definition of 'ineligible' became very elastic in practice. This demonstrates that when a new treatment is seen as transformative, clinicians find ways to qualify patients, putting pressure on established guidelines.
The DREAM-7 trial showed a belantumab combination had an overall survival benefit versus a daratumumab regimen, a "premier drug" that previously changed the myeloma treatment landscape. This surprising result establishes a new, higher standard of care and positions belantumab as a top-tier therapy, not merely another option.
Unlike older IMiDs where T-cell effects are secondary, CELMoDs have a powerful, independent pro-T-cell mechanism. This dual action is so significant that in the future, CELMoDs will be prescribed not just for their direct anti-myeloma effects, but specifically to enhance the efficacy of T-cell therapies like CAR-T and bispecific antibodies.
Rather than moving through distinct lines of therapy, a future strategy could involve an "ADC switch." When a patient progresses on an ADC-IO combination, the IO backbone would remain while the ADC is swapped for one with a different, non-cross-resistant mechanism, adapting the treatment in real-time.
In newly diagnosed, transplant-ineligible myeloma, an iberdomide-based triplet (Iber-Dara-Dex) achieved 64% MRD negativity. This result is described as "astounding" because achieving MRD negativity is not even a realistic goal for comparable IMiD-based triplets like Dara-Len-Dex (the MAYA regimen). This sets a dramatically higher efficacy bar for frontline treatments.
The term "functional cure" is misleading and hinders progress. With one-third of heavily pretreated patients in the Cartitude 1 trial remaining disease-free for five years without maintenance, the data supports the classical definition of a "cure" used in other cancers. This semantic shift is crucial for advancing the field.
The dramatic efficacy boost from adding epcoritamab suggests it's the primary driver of patient benefit, not just an adjunct. This shifts the conceptual framework, positioning the bispecific antibody as the new therapeutic backbone, with rituximab and lenalidomide as supportive agents.
