Incremental increases in material production won't significantly move the needle on energy consumption. The next 10x in per capita energy use will be driven by two main factors: expanding aviation to billions of people and the explosive growth of AI compute, which acts as a 'per capita' increase in intelligence.

The common narrative for a post-labor future is Universal Basic Income (UBI). However, Elon Musk's perspective is "Universal High Income." This vision is not about wealth redistribution but about radical technological deflation, where the costs of energy, labor, and transportation approach zero, creating massive abundance and purchasing power for everyone.

Elon Musk predicts that in a future where AI and robotics can produce any good or service on demand, money becomes irrelevant. The ultimate currency becomes energy, as it's a fundamental physical resource that cannot be legislated into existence.

The narrative of energy being a hard cap on AI's growth is largely overstated. AI labs treat energy as a solvable cost problem, not an insurmountable barrier. They willingly pay significant premiums for faster, non-traditional power solutions because these extra costs are negligible compared to the massive expense of GPUs.

The race to build power infrastructure for AI may lead to an oversupply if adoption follows a sigmoid curve. This excess capacity, much like the post-dot-com broadband glut, could become a positive externality that significantly lowers future energy prices for all consumers.

Economic growth is a direct function of the reduction in the price of energy. Nations with access to cheap, locally available energy are almost uniformly wealthy, regardless of their system of governance, while those without it are almost uniformly poor.

The rise of rooftop solar, local batteries, and on-site generation means power is increasingly produced closer to where it's used. This trend is devaluing long-distance transmission infrastructure and suggests the future grid will be far more decentralized and localized.

The cost of electricity has two components: making it and moving it. Generation ("making") costs are plummeting due to cheap solar. However, transmission ("moving") costs are rising from aging infrastructure. This indicates the biggest area for innovation is in distribution, not generation.

Scarcity is not a fixed limit but a market signal. As a resource becomes scarce, its price rises. This incentivizes human ingenuity to discover alternatives, improve efficiency, or find new extraction methods. Markets create a homeostatic system that prevents us from ever truly 'running out.'