Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Despite hype for competitors like Six Flags, splitting the property (Propco) from operations (Opco) for United Parks would likely fail to unlock value. The required rent coverage and cap rates for entertainment REITs mean the combined valuation would probably not exceed the current enterprise value. The strategy only makes sense in a take-private for tax efficiency.

Related Insights

Unlike a tech or service business, the core value of a theme park is the physical, irreplaceable asset itself. This provides a margin of safety against management mistakes. While poor decisions can hurt performance, it is difficult to permanently destroy the value of a well-located, branded physical park, making it a more durable investment.

Sponsor Five Point intentionally structured Landbridge (land assets) and Waterbridge (operating assets) as separate public companies. Bundling perpetual, high-optionality land assets within an operating company often leads to the market undervaluing them. This spin-off strategy allows each business to be capitalized appropriately based on its distinct risk profile.

Despite strong performance in Parks and streaming, Disney's stock is flat because the market values the entire conglomerate based on its weakest segment: declining linear networks. Spinning off these "bad bank" assets would unlock the true value of the high-growth divisions.

By applying a real estate valuation framework (NOI conversion with a CapEx reserve), United Parks appears extraordinarily cheap. Its 8% unlevered cash yield after CapEx starkly contrasts with the 3-4% yields of stable multifamily properties, highlighting a potential market mispricing for this hard asset business.

Majority owner Hillpath is contractually limited from exceeding 70% ownership. The company's aggressive share buyback program is rapidly increasing Hillpath's stake toward this ceiling. This creates a medium-term catalyst, forcing a decision: either halt the value-accretive buybacks or pursue a strategic alternative like a full sale of the company.

United Parks exhibits traits that are "catnip" to value investors: levered buybacks, irreplaceable assets, and a majority hedge fund owner. However, these situations can be dangerous. An excessive focus on financial metrics can obscure fundamental business problems, creating a value trap where everything looks great on paper while actual operations are struggling.

Madison Square Garden Sports, owning both the Knicks and Rangers, trades at an enterprise value of ~$6B. Given the Lakers sold for $10B, the market effectively values the Rangers at or below zero. An activist idea is to split the teams into two separate public companies to unlock this hidden value.

A key risk with majority PE ownership is that management might "strip" the business by underinvesting. The best place to check is CapEx. United Parks is spending ~13% of revenue on CapEx, in line with pre-COVID averages. This suggests a commitment to reinvesting to keep parks fresh, a positive sign for long-term value.

Many companies trade at a discount to their sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) value, but this can persist indefinitely. The key to unlocking value is a "hard catalyst," like a 100% spin-off, which forces the market to value separated assets independently. This is more effective than partial spin-offs or tracking stocks.

The historical advantage of simply carving out a business that a corporation undervalued is gone. Increased competition and complexity mean that without a critical eye and deep expertise, carve-outs are now just as likely to fail as they are to succeed, with average returns declining over the last decade.