Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Current immunocompetent mouse models for RCC have a major limitation: they are naturally T-cell depleted, with T-cells comprising only 1-10% of immune cells versus 40-70% in human tumors. This makes them excellent for studying myeloid biology but suboptimal for understanding T-cell mediated responses to immunotherapy.

Related Insights

While revolutionary for liquid tumors, CAR-T cells struggle to attack solid tumors. The tumor's 'microenvironment'—a complex ecosystem of blood vessels, immune cells, and supportive structures—acts as a physical and biological barrier that prevents the engineered T-cells from reaching their target.

The failure of immunotherapies like BiTEs in extramedullary sites (e.g., pleura, small bowel) is not just a drug delivery problem. These tissue microenvironments contain immuno-regulatory influences that actively suppress T-cell engagement and function, creating a biological barrier to effective treatment.

Developing CAR T-cell therapies for solid tumors is difficult because many tumor-associated antigens are also expressed on normal tissues. This creates a significant risk of "on-target, off-tumor" effects, causing severe toxicity. Mitigating this risk, for instance with engineered "kill switches," is as crucial as preserving the therapy's efficacy.

Instead of focusing solely on T-cells, Create's platform first targets myeloid cells, which constitute up to 60% of some solid tumors. Programming these cells transforms the tumor microenvironment, enabling a 5-10x influx of CD8 T-cells. This overcomes a key barrier for T-cell therapies in solid tumors.

A leading hypothesis for why adding immunotherapy to chemoradiation failed is that radiation, particularly for central tumors, destroys the very lymphocytes immunotherapy aims to activate. This biological mechanism suggests the radiation essentially canceled out the drug's intended effect.

There is an inherent selection bias in RCC preclinical models. The tumors that successfully grow in mice, whether genetically engineered or patient-derived, tend to be the more aggressive, de-differentiated phenotypes. It is very difficult to model the common, low-grade, indolent clear cell tumors often seen in the clinic.

Combination therapies in RCC are not immunologically equivalent. IO-IO (e.g., Ipi/Nivo) primarily promotes a CD8 T-cell response, associated with durable cures. In contrast, IO-TKI combinations stimulate B-cell and T-follicular helper cell responses, representing a fundamentally different mechanism of action within the tumor microenvironment.

While the field focuses heavily on T-cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, Dr. Radvanyi argues that dendritic cells have not received enough attention. Better understanding how to activate these primary antigen-presenting cells is crucial for priming effective and durable anti-tumor immune responses, especially within tertiary lymphoid structures.

For solid tumors, the critical design hurdle for T-cell engagers is achieving selectivity. Most target antigens are also expressed at low levels on healthy cells, so molecules must be engineered to attack tumors with high antigen expression while sparing healthy tissue to avoid on-target, off-tumor toxicity.

Recent findings from the AACR conference show a trend away from discovering new T-cell function-promoting targets. Instead, researchers are focusing on novel targets that alter the tumor microenvironment, such as breaking down collagen or repolarizing immune cells, to make existing therapies like checkpoint inhibitors more effective.