Get your free personalized podcast brief
We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
An investor explains his thesis: avoid the AI application layer, as it's impossible to predict which new model capabilities will make today's apps obsolete. Instead, invest in infrastructure that enables or extends the revenue of the major platforms (like OpenAI) or the open-source ecosystem that hedges against them.
Related Insights
Instead of betting on specific AI models like ChatGPT, a more robust strategy is to invest in the underlying infrastructure that all AI development requires. This 'onion' approach focuses on second-order essentials like semiconductors and data centers, which are poised to grow regardless of which consumer-facing application wins.
During the dot-com crash, application-layer companies like Pets.com went to zero, while infrastructure providers like Intel and Cisco survived. The lesson for AI investors is to focus on the underlying "picks and shovels"—compute, chips, and data centers—rather than consumer-facing apps that may become obsolete.
The AI value stack has evolved from chips (NVIDIA) to models (OpenAI). The next critical phase is the application layer. It's unclear if value will be captured by new application companies or if the underlying model providers will absorb all the profits, a key question for investors and founders.
Instead of betting on which AI models or applications will win, Karmel Capital focuses on the infrastructure layer (neocloud companies). This "pick and shovel" strategy provides exposure to the entire ecosystem's growth with lower valuations and less risk, as infrastructure is essential regardless of who wins at the top layers.
Despite massive investment in chips (NVIDIA) and models (OpenAI), it is not yet clear where long-term value will concentrate. The entire stack is in flux. Models could be commoditized by open source, chips could face historical commoditization cycles, and new AI-native apps could capture the most value. We are only in the early innings of a 30-year shift.
When investing in AI, the focus should be on companies building durable, multi-purpose infrastructure or solving real-world problems with a sustainable data flywheel. This approach is superior to backing firms with impressive tech demonstrations that lack a clear, defensible business model.
Rather than picking a winning AI or crypto, the smarter investment is in the 'picks and shovels.' This means focusing on the infrastructure every autonomous agent will require to transact—such as wallets, custody services, and blockchain rails—regardless of which specific application succeeds.
The vast majority of spending and market capitalization in AI today is in the infrastructure layer—compute (NVIDIA), foundation models (OpenAI), and data services. The entire application layer's revenue combined is a rounding error in comparison, highlighting a massive, though likely temporary, imbalance in where value is currently being captured.
AI makes it easy to replicate successful software, diminishing moats. This threat of being "vibe coded" pushes early-stage investors like Hustle Fund to seek defensibility by backing more complex, harder-to-copy infrastructure and hardware companies instead of just applications.
The economic value in AI is rapidly shifting away from foundational models, which are becoming commoditized far faster than anticipated. The real, sustainable business models are emerging at the infrastructure layer (cloud, chips) and the application layer, not in the foundational models themselves.
