The high-stakes world of deal-making is described as 'the flow,' a state that rewards total commitment but punishes those who are 'half in, half out.' Success requires giving one's all to the ecosystem, as it extracts value from those who only attempt to take from it.
Related Insights
In venture capital, an investor's reputation is constantly on the line. A successful exit in one fund doesn't satisfy the LPs of a subsequent fund. This creates relentless pressure to consistently perform, as you're only as good as your last hit and can never rest on past achievements.
A founder's deep, intrinsic passion for their company's mission is critical for long-term success. Even with a sound business model, a lack of genuine care leads to burnout and failure when challenges arise. Leaders cannot sustain success in areas they consider a distraction from their "real" passion, like AGI research versus product monetization.
Unlike a founder focused on one company, a VC operates at the nexus of disparate stakeholder contexts (LPs, portfolio crises, new pitches). This creates a unique 'whiplash' that requires deliberate systems for prioritization and mental management to be effective.
Conventional advice about work-life balance to avoid burnout is counterproductive for founders with extreme ambitions. Building a massive, venture-scale company requires a level of obsessive focus and sacrifice that is inherently unbalanced. For this specific phase of life, prioritizing the company above all else is necessary for success.
Thrive Capital's strategy of making a few large bets is not just for financial returns. It's an ideological choice to align with "life's work founders" for whom their startup is a portfolio of one. This ensures every win feels great and every loss hurts, creating true skin in the game.
New VCs often rush to make deals to prove themselves, but this leads to a portfolio of mediocre companies. These investments consume a disproportionate amount of time and energy, leaving no bandwidth to pursue the truly exceptional, career-making opportunities that may appear later.
While intellectually stimulating, VC can feel like eating endless appetizers without a main course. For those with a builder's mindset, the lack of deep, hands-on involvement in a single venture can lead to a "crisis of purpose" and a desire for more substantial, operational work.
The hardest transition from entrepreneur to investor is curbing the instinct to solve problems and imagine "what could be." The best venture deals aren't about fixing a company but finding teams already on a trajectory to succeed, then helping change the slope of that success line on the margin.
Building a significant enterprise requires a level of commitment that fundamentally owns your life. It's a constant presence that demands personal sacrifices in family and relationships. Aspiring founders must consciously accept this trade-off, as the biggest fallacy is believing you can have everything without cost.
The transition from a C-suite operator managing thousands to an investor is jarring. New VCs must adapt from leading large teams to being individual contributors who write their own memos and do their own sourcing. This "scaling down" ability, not just prior success, predicts their success as an investor.
