Unlike past speculative bubbles, the current AI frenzy has near-universal, top-down support. The government wants domestic investment, tech giants are in a competitive spending arms race, and financial markets profit from the growth narrative. This rare alignment of interests from all major actors creates a powerful, self-reinforcing mandate for the bubble to continue expanding.

Blinder asserts that while AI is a genuine technological revolution, historical parallels (autos, PCs) show such transformations are always accompanied by speculative bubbles. He argues it would be contrary to history if this wasn't the case, suggesting a major market correction and corporate shakeout is inevitable.

The US economy is not broadly strong; its perceived strength is almost entirely driven by a massive, concentrated bet on AI. This singular focus props up markets and growth metrics, but it conceals widespread weakness in other sectors, creating a high-stakes, fragile economic situation.

The current AI spending frenzy uniquely merges elements from all major historical bubbles—real estate (data centers), technology, loose credit, and a government backstop—making a soft landing improbable. This convergence of risk factors is unprecedented.

Despite populist rhetoric, the administration needs the economic stimulus and stock market rally driven by AI capital expenditures. In return, tech CEOs gain political favor and a permissive environment, creating a symbiotic relationship where power politics override public concerns about the technology.

The most immediate systemic risk from AI may not be mass unemployment but an unsustainable financial market bubble. Sky-high valuations of AI-related companies pose a more significant short-term threat to economic stability than the still-developing impact of AI on the job market.

The robust performance of the AI sector buoys the stock market, creating a positive economic narrative. This economic stability acts as 'cloud cover,' distracting the public and enabling politicians to pursue controversial or anti-democratic actions without immediate economic backlash that would otherwise trigger public outrage.

Criticizing AI presents a political dilemma because it's a primary driver of stock market gains. With more Americans viewing the market as a barometer of their financial health, politicians risk alienating voters if an anti-AI stance is perceived as a threat to their retirement accounts.

The current market boom, largely driven by AI enthusiasm, provides critical political cover for the Trump administration. An AI market downturn would severely weaken his political standing. This creates an incentive for the administration to take extraordinary measures, like using government funds to backstop private AI companies, to prevent a collapse.