An employee can be 'fearless' knowing they can find another job. A founder loses this safety net. The psychological burden shifts to a deeply personal responsibility for employees' livelihoods, investors' money, and the vision, making the stakes feel infinitely higher.
Related Insights
The essence of the entrepreneurial journey is the ability to tolerate immense uncertainty and fear over long periods. It involves working for months or years with little visible progress, making high-stakes decisions with limited information, and shouldering the responsibility for others' livelihoods. This psychological endurance is the ultimate differentiator.
The most common failure mode for a founder-CEO isn't a lack of competence, but a crisis of confidence. This leads to hesitation on critical decisions, especially firing an underperforming executive. The excuses for delaying are merely symptoms of this confidence gap.
The CEO role is not a joyful or fun job; it's a high-pressure, problem-solving position. Founders who love their craft, like software engineering, often take the CEO title out of necessity to solve a larger problem and bring a vision to life, not because they desire the job itself.
All founders make high-impact mistakes. The critical failure point is when those mistakes erode their confidence, leading to hesitation. This indecisiveness creates a power vacuum, causing senior employees to get nervous and jockey for position, which spirals the organization into a dysfunctional, political state.
Many people start companies seeking control over their schedule or finances. Bianca Gates warns this is a fallacy. Entrepreneurship is a 24/7 commitment where you're the "last person on the ship." Unlike a regular job, you can't just give notice and quit, especially after taking on investors.
The intense, unreasonable passion that fuels hyper-growth is the same trait that can lead a founder to make reckless, company-threatening decisions. You can't have the creative genius without the potential for destructive behavior. The same person who clears the path can also blow everything up.
The number one reason founders fail is not a lack of competence but a crisis of confidence that leads to hesitation. They see what needs to be done but delay, bogged down by excuses. In a fast-moving environment, a smart decision made too late is no longer a smart decision.
The motivation to start a company wasn't about a guaranteed outcome but about embracing the ultimate test of one's capabilities. The realization that most founders, regardless of experience, are figuring it out as they go is empowering. It reframes the founder journey from a path for experts to a challenge for the determined.
