MongoDB's CEO argues that successful pivots during tech transitions like cloud or AI are fundamentally change management challenges, not technical ones. The biggest risk for established companies is complacency. Leadership must force the organization to lean into new platform shifts, even when their maturity is uncertain, to avoid being disrupted like Nokia or BlackBerry.
Despite proven cost efficiencies from deploying fine-tuned AI models, companies report the primary barrier to adoption is human, not technical. The core challenge is overcoming employee inertia and successfully integrating new tools into existing workflows—a classic change management problem.
Companies that experiment endlessly with AI but fail to operationalize it face the biggest risk of falling behind. The danger lies not in ignoring AI, but in lacking the change management and workflow redesign needed to move from small-scale tests to full integration.
The true challenge of AI for many businesses isn't mastering the technology. It's shifting the entire organization from a predictable "delivery" mindset to an "innovation" one that is capable of managing rapid experimentation and uncertainty—a muscle many established companies haven't yet built.
Navigating technological upheaval requires the same crisis management skills as operating in a conflict zone: rapid pivoting, complex scenario planning, and aligning stakeholders (like donors or investors) around a new, high-risk strategy. The core challenges are surprisingly similar.
Implementing AI is becoming less of a technical challenge and more of a human one. The key difficulties are in managing change, helping people adapt to new workflows, and overcoming resistance, making skills like design thinking and lean startup crucial for success.
Competing in the AI era requires a fundamental cultural shift towards experimentation and scientific rigor. According to Intercom's CEO, older companies can't just decide to build an AI feature; they need a complete operational reset to match the speed and learning cycles of AI-native disruptors.
When selling to senior technical leaders, do not assume the conversation will be about technical vision or features. A CTO at a top 50 company was more concerned with how a new technology would affect thousands of workers and how the vendor would support that transition. The human and organizational impact often outweighs the technology itself.
Companies fail to generate AI ROI not because the technology is inadequate, but because they neglect the human element. Resistance, fear, and lack of buy-in must be addressed through empathetic change management and education.
In the age of AI, 10-15 year old SaaS companies face an existential crisis. To stay relevant, they must be willing to make radical changes to culture and product, even if it threatens existing revenue. The alternative is becoming a legacy player as nimbler startups capture the market.
The most significant hurdle for businesses adopting revenue-driving AI is often internal resistance from senior leaders. Their fear, lack of understanding, or refusal to experiment can hold the entire organization back from crucial innovation.