A significant shift is occurring in legal hiring, where practical AI proficiency is becoming more valuable than traditional credentials. Some firms now state they would hire an AI expert from a mid-tier school over a top Harvard graduate with no AI experience.
Related Insights
Since modern AI is so new, no one has more than a few years of relevant experience. This levels the playing field. The best hiring strategy is to prioritize young, AI-native talent with a steep learning curve over senior engineers whose experience may be less relevant. Dynamism and adaptability trump tenure.
New firm-level data shows that companies adopting AI are not laying off staff, but are significantly slowing junior-level hiring. The impact is most pronounced for graduates from good-but-not-elite universities, as AI automates the mid-level cognitive tasks these entry roles typically handle.
Theoretical knowledge is now just a prerequisite, not the key to getting hired in AI. Companies demand candidates who can demonstrate practical, day-one skills in building, deploying, and maintaining real, scalable AI systems. The ability to build is the new currency.
The traditional law firm model relies on a large base of junior associates for grunt work. As AI automates these tasks, the need for a large entry-level class shrinks, while mid-career lawyers who can effectively leverage AI become more valuable, morphing the firm's structure into a diamond shape.
When building core AI technology, prioritize hiring 'AI-native' recent graduates over seasoned veterans. These individuals often possess a fearless execution mindset and a foundational understanding of new paradigms that is critical for building from the ground up, countering the traditional wisdom of hiring for experience.
A key job for junior lawyers is understanding non-legal context for a case, like a pharmaceutical supply chain. AI excels here by rapidly synthesizing massive amounts of diverse, industry-specific information alongside legal precedent, which is a core part of the value.
Employers now value practical skills over academic scores. In response, students are creating "parallel curriculums" through hackathons, certifications, and open-source contributions. A demonstrable portfolio of what they've built is now more critical than their GPA for getting hired.
The class of 2026 will be the first "ChatGPT generation." Their key selling point to employers will not be their potential or affordability, but their innate ability to leverage generative AI for productivity, a skill that more senior, "AI laggard" employees may lack.
Experience alone no longer determines engineering productivity. An engineer's value is now a function of their experience plus their fluency with AI tools. Experienced coders who haven't adapted are now less valuable than AI-native recent graduates, who are in high demand.
At the start of a tech cycle, the few people with deep, practical experience often don't fit traditional molds (e.g., top CS degrees). Companies must look beyond standard credentials to find this scarce talent, much like early mobile experts who weren't always "cracked" competitive coders.
