While AWS's Tranium chip lags Nvidia's general-purpose GPUs in raw performance, its success with startup Descartes in real-time video highlights a viable strategy: win by becoming the best-in-class solution for specific, high-value workloads rather than competing head-on.
Related Insights
Despite intense competition, Amazon's core principle of being 'customer obsessed' means AWS would likely provide Google's TPU chips if key customers demand them. This prioritizes customer retention over platform exclusivity in the AI chip wars.
By funding and backstopping CoreWeave, which exclusively uses its GPUs, NVIDIA establishes its hardware as the default for the AI cloud. This gives NVIDIA leverage over major customers like Microsoft and Amazon, who are developing their own chips. It makes switching to proprietary silicon more difficult, creating a competitive moat based on market structure, not just technology.
Jensen Huang's core strategy is to be a market creator, not a competitor. He actively avoids "red ocean" battles for existing market share, focusing instead on developing entirely new technologies and applications, like parallel processing for gaming and then AI, which established entirely new industries.
Nvidia's staggering revenue growth and 56% net profit margins are a direct cost to its largest customers (AWS, Google, OpenAI). This incentivizes them to form a defacto alliance to develop and adopt alternative chips to commoditize the accelerator market and reclaim those profits.
Startups like Cognition Labs find their edge not by competing on pre-training large models, but by mastering post-training. They build specialized reinforcement learning environments that teach models specific, real-world workflows (e.g., using Datadog for debugging), creating a defensible niche that larger players overlook.
Top-tier kernels like FlashAttention are co-designed with specific hardware (e.g., H100). This tight coupling makes waiting for future GPUs an impractical strategy. The competitive edge comes from maximizing the performance of available hardware now, even if it means rewriting kernels for each new generation.
Instead of competing for market share, Jensen Huang focuses on creating entirely new markets where there are initially "no customers." This "zero-billion-dollar market" strategy ensures there are also no competitors, allowing NVIDIA to build a dominant position from scratch.
Tesla's decision to stop developing its Dojo training supercomputer is not a failure. It's a strategic shift to focus on designing hyper-efficient inference chips for its vehicles and robots. This vertical integration at the edge, where real-world decisions are made, is seen as more critical than competing with NVIDIA on training hardware.
Beyond capital, Amazon's deal with OpenAI includes a crucial stipulation: OpenAI must use Amazon's proprietary Trainium AI chips. This forces adoption by a leading AI firm, providing a powerful proof point for Trainium as a viable competitor to Nvidia's market-dominant chips and creating a captive customer for Amazon's hardware.
The competitive threat from custom ASICs is being neutralized as NVIDIA evolves from a GPU company to an "AI factory" provider. It is now building its own specialized chips (e.g., CPX) for niche workloads, turning the ASIC concept into a feature of its own disaggregated platform rather than an external threat.
