Investors often treat holding a stock as a passive state. However, the decision not to sell is an active choice to reinvest that capital at its current value. This reframes the act of holding into a daily, deliberate evaluation of whether the stock remains the best use of your money.
Related Insights
Contrary to the industry's bias for action, Howard Marks advocates for strategic inaction, flipping the common saying to 'don't just do something, sit there.' True long-term success comes from owning good assets and letting ideas work, not from constant trading and reacting to short-term market noise.
Compounding is a fragile process. Every portfolio adjustment, like trimming or panic selling, is like opening a door and letting heat escape. Treating your portfolio as a contained machine that works best when untouched reframes "doing nothing" as a strategic, structural advantage.
Shifting your mindset from trading a stock ticker to owning a piece of a business encourages a long-term perspective. This framework, highlighted by investor Chris Davis, forces you to consider the business's community, values, and operational health, leading to better alignment.
To decide whether to sell a long-held asset you're attached to, imagine it was sold overnight and the cash is in your account. The question then becomes: "Would you use that cash to buy it back today?" This reframe bypasses status quo bias and the endowment effect, making the correct decision immediately obvious.
Objectively track whether new information strengthens or weakens your belief in each holding on a monthly basis. This simple journaling practice forces a regular review, helping you decide whether to add capital or trim a position based on fundamentals, not share price movement.
To combat endowment effect and status quo bias, legendary trader Paul Tudor Jones advises viewing every position as if you were deciding to put it on today. This creates a zero-based mindset, forcing you to justify each holding's continued place in your portfolio.
Rather than passively holding a stock, the "buy and optimize" strategy involves actively managing its weighting in a portfolio. As a stock becomes more expensive relative to its intrinsic value, the position is trimmed, and when it gets cheaper, it is increased, creating an additional layer of return.
Evaluate every check, including follow-on investments, independently from prior commitments. The decision should be based solely on the current risk-adjusted value of that capital, not on past investments, which prevents throwing good money after bad.
Suboptimal selling is often driven by fear: a position gets "too big" or you want to lock in gains. A better approach is to only sell when you find a new investment you "love" more. This forces a positive, opportunity-cost framework rather than a negative, fear-based one, letting winners run.
While having a disciplined rule like reviewing a stock after 24 months is useful, it should be subordinate to a more critical rule: sell immediately if the fundamental investment thesis breaks. This flexibility prevents holding onto a losing position simply to adhere to a predefined timeline.
