Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Equity markets historically exhibit negative seasonality leading into midterm elections. While current policy narratives may seem to reinforce this weakness, the underlying secular trend of the AI infrastructure buildout is expected to remain strong and less sensitive to election outcomes than campaign rhetoric suggests.

Related Insights

While the overall economic growth outlook is unlikely to change significantly based on the election, specific sectors face distinct risks. Power and data center REITs are tied to AI policy, while consumer and healthcare sectors are exposed to potential changes in SNAP and Medicaid.

The timing of AI market FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) isn't random; it shows a consistent seasonality. Panics often amplify during the summer, a period historically known for "momentum breakdowns" in markets. This context suggests current anxieties may be magnified by recurring market psychology rather than fundamentals alone.

The bank asserts that the massive wave of AI and data center capital expenditure will proceed regardless of interest rate levels or overall economic growth. This suggests the demand for computing power is a powerful secular trend that transcends typical cyclical business investment patterns.

Despite hundreds of millions being spent on pro-AI lobbying, AI is not a simple right vs. left issue. The tangible impacts of job loss and data center energy consumption affect voters across the political spectrum, making it a highly fluid and unpredictable issue for the upcoming midterm elections.

The dominant market driver will transition from macro risks like tariffs and policy uncertainty to micro, asset-specific stories. The key focus will be on company-level analysis of AI capital expenditure plans and their impact on earnings.

The foundation of the next technological era is physical infrastructure: data centers, power, and chips. If the US loses its lead in building this foundation through political headwinds or lack of investment, its technological supremacy will erode. The future of innovation depends on this domestic build-out.

The extreme divergence in market returns between strong presidential years and weak midterm years from 1962-1982 was driven by populist political cycles. This pattern is re-emerging, as seen in 2022's sharp drop and 2024's strength, because the same underlying political forces are now at play.

The robust performance of the AI sector buoys the stock market, creating a positive economic narrative. This economic stability acts as 'cloud cover,' distracting the public and enabling politicians to pursue controversial or anti-democratic actions without immediate economic backlash that would otherwise trigger public outrage.

A cynical political cycle is predicted where politicians, chasing popular opinion fueled by negative AI press, will publicly oppose data centers before elections. Once re-elected, they will likely reverse their stance, claiming they "made peace" with the industry, having secured both votes and industry donations.

The core US policy is to facilitate the AI buildout to win the geopolitical AI race. Because the government is effectively "short nominal growth" via its massive deficit, it must foster economic expansion at all costs. This creates a powerful, persistent tailwind for the market, making sustained bearishness difficult.

Investors Should Look Past Seasonal Midterm Market Weakness to the Durable AI Buildout Trend | RiffOn