We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Truly creating a new category is rare. A more effective strategy is creating a sub-category by anchoring your product to an understood concept, framing it as 'like X, but different in a key way.' For example, Drift was 'live chat, but for sales,' not an entirely new concept.
Marketers often mistake strategic positioning (finding a niche) for true category creation. A new category introduces a solution to a problem customers haven't yet articulated, requiring education on why they need a thing they've never bought before.
When creating a new category like Drift's "conversational marketing," no search volume exists for the new term. Marketers must capture demand from high-volume, existing terms (e.g., "live chat") and use that traffic to educate the audience on the new category's unique value.
Bootstrappers lack the capital and time to establish a new market category. A better strategy is to anchor your product in a known category (e.g., "site audit tool") and then use your unique features (e.g., "that also fixes the issues") as a key differentiator.
The backlash against 'category creation' isn't about the concept itself, but its poor execution. Critics react negatively when marketers simply apply a new name to a product in an existing category without any fundamental product differentiation. This is seen as disingenuous marketing spin rather than true innovation.
Obsessing over creating a new market category is often a mistake. Data shows the vast majority of successful public tech companies compete within established categories. It's more effective to get "invited to the party" by using a known category label and then winning with a sharp, differentiated value proposition.
Most companies claiming to create new categories are actually creating sub-categories. They anchor their concept to something familiar, like Drift positioning as "live chat, but for sales" or the first cars being called "horseless carriages." This is more realistic as it doesn't require educating the market from zero.
Instead of inventing a completely new market, position your product as a sub-category of something people already understand (e.g., "like live chat, but for sales"). This "horseless carriage" approach makes innovation digestible by grounding it in a familiar concept, as Drift did.
Many marketers mistakenly start with the goal of creating a new category. However, a new category only emerges as a downstream consequence of a strong, existing demand that is poorly served by all current products. The demand must exist before a new category can be successfully established.
When customers already use a similar product, don't just claim to be "better," as this keeps you in the same mental bucket. Instead, create a new sub-category (e.g., "legacy humidifiers" vs. "next-gen"). This forces the buyer to re-evaluate their needs against a new standard you define, separating you from the competition.
Many 'category creation' efforts fail because they just rename an existing solution. True category creation happens when customers perceive the product as fundamentally different from all alternatives, even without an official name for it. The customer's mental bucketing is the only one that matters.