We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Before 2008, financial firms dismissed proactive branding. The crisis and resulting reputation damage (like Goldman Sachs' "vampire squid" label) created a paradigm shift, forcing the industry to invest in offensive brand-building to survive and regain trust.
Lloyd Blankfein advises today's tech leaders to learn from Goldman's PR failures. Because the firm was wholesale and didn't communicate its societal value, there was no public goodwill to draw upon during the financial crisis. Proactively explaining your function in the economy is an essential defense.
Many brands retreat to safety during turmoil. However, a true existential crisis can be a unique opportunity, forcing teams to abandon failing playbooks and embrace the unorthodox, high-risk creative ideas that would otherwise be rejected by the system.
Citadel moved beyond its reputation as a brutal "gulag" by strategically showcasing founder Ken Griffin's expertise on broad topics like policy and economics. This positioned him as a public intellectual, creating an aspirational brand halo that reframed the firm's intensity as a byproduct of excellence.
In the 2020-2022 era of cheap capital, brands could afford to "move fast and break things." Now, with tighter funding and a more complicated marketing mix, a solid brand strategy is a foundational requirement for survival, not a later-stage luxury.
View your brand as a bank. Short-term, performance-driven actions are withdrawals to hit immediate goals. Brand-building activities are deposits that build long-term equity. If you only make withdrawals without making deposits, you will eventually deplete the brand until it is bankrupt and means nothing to consumers.
Ogle emphasizes that working for one of the nine "bulge bracket" investment banks provides an immediate brand halo. This prestige makes attracting top-tier clientele significantly easier, as the brand itself serves as a powerful signal of trust and capability in the market.
Without a deliberate strategy to shape your brand identity and market position, customers will create their own narrative. This perception is often negative or inaccurate (e.g., 'outdated,' 'slow,' 'expensive'). Proactively telling your story is crucial to controlling your brand and preventing the market from dictating your reputation.
You can't erase a brand-damaging event like a public controversy. The solution is not to address it directly but to create so many new, positive associations for your audience that the negative event shrinks into irrelevance over time. You fix the brand by addition, not subtraction.
When a branding mistake occurs, like a scandal or bad press, the strategy is not to deny or hide it. Instead, you should overwhelm the negative association by creating a high volume of new, positive pairings and experiences for your audience until the original mistake becomes irrelevant.
While laying off staff and facing funding cuts, CEO Jada McKenna made the difficult decision to invest in the rebrand. She framed it not as an expense, but as a necessary investment in building their future and changing the narrative around aid. It was a strategic move to reject a negative trajectory.