For individuals who both design and code, finishing a visual design isn't a moment of triumph but one of dread, as they know the lengthy process of coding it from scratch has just begun. This specific emotional pain point is a core motivator for building next-generation tools that eliminate this redundant step.

Related Insights

AI-powered "vibe coding" is reversing the design workflow. Instead of starting in Figma, designers now build functional prototypes directly with code-generating tools. Figma has shifted from being the first step (exploration) to the last step (fine-tuning the final 20% of pixel-perfect details).

The idea that design systems stifle creativity stems from the high cost of re-coding components after a design change. In a world with a single source of truth, where design changes automatically update the code, this cost disappears, allowing systems to be radically changed without engineering overhead.

AI's productivity gains mean that on a lean, early-stage team, there is little room for purely specialized roles. According to founder Drew Wilson, every team member, including designers, must be able to contribute directly to the codebase. The traditional "design artifact" workflow is too slow.

The traditional, linear handoff from product spec to design to code is collapsing. Roles and stages are blurring, with interactive prototypes replacing static documents and the design file itself becoming the central place for the entire team to align and collaborate.

The current model of separate design files and codebases is inefficient. Future tools will enable designers to directly manipulate production code through a visual canvas, eliminating the handoff process and creating a single, shared source of truth for the entire team.

A prototype-first culture, accelerated by AI tools, allows teams to surface and resolve design and workflow conflicts early. At Webflow, designers were asked to 'harmonize' their separate prototypes, preventing a costly integration problem that would have been much harder to fix later in the development cycle.

As AI models become proficient at generating high-quality UI from prompts, the value of manual design execution will diminish. A professional designer's key differentiator will become their ability to build the underlying, unique component libraries and design systems that AI will use to create those UIs.

Traditionally, designers needed to understand code limitations to create feasible UIs. With tools that render a live DOM on the canvas, this is no longer necessary. If a design can be created in the tool, it is, by definition, valid and buildable code.

As AI tools empower individuals to handle tasks across the entire product development lifecycle, traditional, siloed roles are merging. This fundamental shift challenges how tech professionals define their value and contribution, causing significant professional anxiety.

CNX discovered that its target users—backend RPG programmers—struggled with or were uninterested in modern UI/UX design. This realization led them to build a low-code tool to provide guardrails and ensure consistent, modern front-ends without requiring front-end expertise.