To fix the R&D funding imbalance, the CEO proposes a 'one fair price' system. A drug would have one US price with no rebates, and a price in other developed nations would be indexed to their GDP per capita.
Related Insights
The U.S. market's high prices create the large profit pool necessary to fund risky drug development. If the U.S. adopted price negotiation like other countries, the global incentive for pharmaceutical innovation would shrink, resulting in fewer new drugs being developed worldwide.
A significant number of Eli Lilly's compelling inventions came from unsanctioned projects. The company intentionally provides budget flexibility and avoids micromanagement at its R&D sites, allowing scientists to pursue their curiosity.
Historically a Democratic focus, drug pricing policy has been co-opted by Republicans, making it a bipartisan political issue. This alignment creates a stable policy overhang and sustained uncertainty around pricing and innovation, deterring generalist investors regardless of which party is in power.
To commercialize curative 'one-and-done' genetic medicines, Eli Lilly is considering a subscription-like model. The procedure could be free upfront, with patients or insurers paying an ongoing fee only as long as it works.
The long-held belief that solving obesity would create immense wealth is now validated by Eli Lilly's $1T market cap, driven by its GLP-1 weight-loss drugs. This marks a significant shift, as the trillion-dollar club was previously dominated by tech and oil companies.
To solve the insulin price bubble, Eli Lilly launched its own low-list-price biosimilar. However, insurers and PBMs initially refused to cover it because its low price and small rebate threatened their lucrative business model.
A centrist solution to high drug prices involves combining ideas from both political aisles. Oliver Libby suggests allowing Medicare to negotiate prices (a left-leaning idea) while also extending patent life for drug companies (a right-leaning idea), thus lowering costs without killing the incentive for innovation.
The large gap between insulin's list and net price was driven by Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs). Their business model, which takes a percentage of the rebate, incentivized pharma to raise list prices to offer bigger discounts.
To avoid the pitfalls of scale in R&D, Eli Lilly operates small, focused labs of 300-400 people. These 'internal biotechs' have mission focus and autonomy, while leveraging the parent company's scale for clinical trials and distribution.
A key part of Eli Lilly's R&D strategy is tackling large-scale health problems that currently have no treatments and therefore represent a 'zero-dollar market.' This blue-ocean strategy contrasts with competitors who focus on areas with established payment pathways.