Unlike traditional chemotherapy, radioligand therapy's toxicity may be inversely correlated with tumor volume. In low-burden disease, fewer cancer cells act as a 'sink' for the drug, potentially leading to higher radiation exposure and side effects in healthy, PSMA-expressing tissues like salivary glands.

While current PRRTs like 177Lu-Edotreotide utilize beta-emitting isotopes, the next major innovation in the field is alpha emitters. These particles are thousands of times more massive and induce more potent double-strand DNA damage, suggesting they will be significantly more effective, albeit with a unique side effect profile to manage.

After years of successfully intensifying hormonal therapy, the focus in prostate cancer is shifting toward de-intensification. Researchers are exploring intermittent therapy for top responders and developing non-hormonal approaches like radioligands to spare patients the chronic, life-altering side effects of permanent castration.

The COMPETE trial's significance is its design, being the first Phase III study to compare a lutetium-based PRRT against a clinically relevant active drug (everolimus). This provides a more robust efficacy benchmark than previous trials that used less standard comparators, making its positive results more meaningful for clinical practice.

The common practice of switching from one ARPI to another upon disease progression is now considered ineffective for most patients. With the advent of proven alternatives like chemotherapy and lutetium, using an "ARPI switch" as the sole control arm in clinical trials is no longer ethically or scientifically sound.

Clinical trials combining potent ARPIs like abiraterone and enzalutamide have consistently failed. Once the androgen receptor pathway is maximally suppressed by one agent, adding another with a similar mechanism provides no further clinical advantage, much like hammering a nail that is already flush with the wood.

Even when testing drugs in heavily pre-treated patients, clinical trials incorporate subtle biological selection criteria. For instance, the COMPASS trial excludes patients with visceral metastases, a tactic to enrich for a population more likely to respond and avoid the most aggressive disease subtypes.

The KIDO 905 trial revealed high rates of adverse events even in the control arm receiving only surgery. This suggests the invasive procedure itself is a major source of patient harm, paving the way for future surgery-free regimens if systemic treatments like EVP prove sufficiently effective.

The IMbark trial demonstrated that an ARPI (enzalutamide), either alone or with ADT, outperformed ADT monotherapy in high-risk patients. This pivotal finding raises the question of whether giving ADT alone in any setting, such as with radiation for localized disease, is now an outdated and inferior approach.