Global governments are actively pursuing policies (running economies hot, suppressing energy costs, managing rates down) to create a period of artificial prosperity. This is a deliberate strategy to push a massive debt sustainability crisis further into the future, which will feel great until it doesn't.
Related Insights
When national debt grows too large, an economy enters "fiscal dominance." The central bank loses its ability to manage the economy, as raising rates causes hyperinflation to cover debt payments while lowering them creates massive asset bubbles, leaving no good options.
Unlike past crises like 2008, the coming debt sustainability crisis will be different because the government's own balance sheet is the source of the instability. This means it will lack the capacity to bail out the market in the same way, fundamentally changing the nature of the crisis.
Despite recent concerns about private credit quality, the most rapid and substantial growth in debt since the GFC has occurred in the government sector. This makes the government bond market, not private credit, the most likely source of a future systemic crisis, especially in a rising rate environment.
Governments with massive debt cannot afford to keep interest rates high, as refinancing becomes prohibitively expensive. This forces central banks to lower rates and print money, even when it fuels asset bubbles. The only exits are an unprecedented productivity boom (like from AI) or a devastating economic collapse.
When a government's deficit spending forces it to borrow new money simply to cover the interest on existing debt, it enters a self-perpetuating "debt death spiral." This weakens the nation's financial position until it either defaults or is forced to make brutal, unpopular cuts, risking internal turmoil.
Politicians choose rate cuts because balancing the budget is politically unpopular and would trigger an immediate economic crisis. By lowering rates, they can "kick the can down the road," making massive government debt refinancing manageable. This intentionally fuels an "everything bubble" in assets as a preferable alternative to politically unpalatable fiscal responsibility.
With debt-to-GDP at 130%, the implicit policy is to use inflation to devalue the debt burden. This is becoming explicit, with proposals like using tariff money for direct stimulus checks. This strategy favors risk assets and creates a 'full on euphoria tech bubble' if real yields go negative again.
Under "fiscal dominance," the U.S. government's massive debt dictates Federal Reserve policy. The Fed must keep rates low enough for the government to afford interest payments, even if it fuels inflation. Monetary policy is no longer about managing the economy but about preventing a debt-driven collapse, making the Fed reactive, not proactive.
The U.S. government's debt is so large that the Federal Reserve is trapped. Raising interest rates would trigger a government default, while cutting them would further inflate the 'everything bubble.' Either path leads to a systemic crisis, a situation economists call 'fiscal dominance.'
The U.S. economy's only viable solution to its long-term debt and inflation is a "beautiful deleveraging"—a painful but controlled economic downturn. The alternative is delaying and being pushed off the cliff by market forces, resulting in a much more severe and uncontrolled crash.
