New research shows ~30% of American teens use AI chatbots daily, compared to only 10% of working adults. This creates an impending skills gap, with an AI-native generation poised to enter a workforce where the majority of incumbents have dramatically less experience with the technology.

Many people's negative opinions on AI-generated content stem from a deep-seated fear of their jobs becoming obsolete. This emotional reaction will fade as AI content becomes indistinguishable from human-created content, making the current debate a temporary, fear-based phenomenon.

Surveys show public panic about AI's impact on jobs and society. However, revealed preferences—actual user behavior—show massive, enthusiastic adoption for daily tasks, from work to personal relationships. Watch what people do, not what they say.

Contrary to the focus on professional use cases, OpenAI's largest study shows that 46% of messages from adult consumer users are from the 18-25 age group. This indicates the emergence of an "AI native" generation whose approach to work and education will be fundamentally different.

The dot-com era, despite bubble fears, was characterized by widespread public optimism. In stark contrast, the current AI boom is met with significant anxiety, with over 30% of Americans fearing AI could end humanity. This level of dread marks a fundamental shift in public sentiment toward new technology.

A significant portion of marketers (36%) think AI will eliminate jobs, yet only 20% fear for their own role. This disconnect highlights a widespread belief that they will personally adapt and benefit from AI, seeing it as an opportunity (70%) rather than a personal threat.

Internal surveys highlight a critical paradox in AI adoption: while over 80% of Stack Overflow's developer community uses or plans to use AI, only 29% trust its output. This significant "trust gap" explains persistent user skepticism and creates a market opportunity for verified, human-curated data.

For information-driven reading, some Gen Z members prefer interacting with AI over reading a book. They view books as static, non-generative sources of knowledge and use AI chatbots to summarize, expand upon, and dynamically engage with the content.

While early media coverage focused on doomsday scenarios, the primary drivers of broad public skepticism are far more immediate. Concerns about white-collar job loss and the devaluation of human art are fueling the anti-AI movement much more effectively than abstract fears of superintelligence.