Arthur Laffer frames the creation of the Fed as the government taking over a previously private monetary system. He notes that from 1776 to 1913, with a private money system, long-term inflation was zero. Since the Fed's creation, the price level has risen 35-fold, demonstrating the instability introduced by government control.
The US Federal Reserve's money printing functions as a global tax through the Cantillon effect. The first recipients of new money (government, large banks) benefit before inflation spreads. This silently dilutes the wealth of all other dollar holders, both domestically and internationally, effectively transferring purchasing power to entities closest to the money printer.
Technological innovation should naturally cause deflation (falling prices). The Fed's 2% inflation target requires printing enough money to first counteract all technological deflation and then add 2% on top, making the true inflationary effect much larger than officially stated.
The act of a small committee deciding the "correct" cost of money is analogous to communist planners setting prices for consumer goods. This approach assumes an impossible level of knowledge and control over a complex economy, a model that has consistently failed throughout history.
To fund deficits, the government prints money, causing inflation that devalues cash and wages. This acts as a hidden tax on the poor and middle class. Meanwhile, the wealthy, who own assets like stocks and real estate that appreciate with inflation, are protected and see their wealth grow, widening the economic divide.
Due to massive government debt, the Fed's tools work paradoxically. Raising rates increases the deficit via higher interest payments, which is stimulative. Cutting rates is also inherently stimulative. The Fed is no longer controlling inflation but merely choosing the path through which it occurs.
The Federal Reserve's ability to print money is a direct mechanism to take value from every citizen without legislation. It is mathematically equivalent to government-sanctioned counterfeiting, devaluing currency and transferring wealth from the populace to the government, acting as a tax.
Central banks evolved from gold warehouses that discovered they could issue more paper receipts (IOUs) than the gold they held, creating a fraudulent but profitable "fractional reserve." This practice was eventually co-opted by governments to fund their activities, not for economic stability.
The word "inflation" is a deliberately implanted euphemism that makes monetary debasement sound like positive growth. The reality is that money is depreciating and its purchasing power is being stolen. Reframing it as "monetary depreciation" reveals the true, negative nature of the process and shifts public perception from a necessary evil to outright theft.
The original definition of inflation is an expansion of the money supply. By shifting the definition to mean rising prices (a consequence), governments can deflect blame for inflation onto businesses, unions, or foreign events, rather than their own money-printing policies.
Economist Arthur Laffer views the rise of cryptocurrencies as a market-driven effort to circumvent government currencies. He sees it as a parallel to the pre-1913 private money system, offering a way for individuals to achieve financial stability and escape the inflation and debasement caused by central banks.