The term 'tokenized money fund' is misleading as it covers three distinct models: fully on-chain funds like BlackRock's BUIDL, traditional 2a-7 funds with new digital share classes, and new 'stablecoin money funds' designed specifically to manage stablecoin reserves under the Genius Act's conservative guidelines.
The SEC's shift to "generic listing standards" for crypto ETFs removes the bespoke, lengthy approval process for each fund. This mirrors a historical rule change in traditional finance that led to a 4X increase in ETF launches, signaling an imminent explosion of diverse crypto products.
Despite being a latecomer, Japan's regulatory framework is setting a global precedent. Its strict requirements—such as 100% backing by high-quality liquid assets and a ban on algorithmic stablecoins—are being mirrored by other major financial centers, positioning Japan's model as the new standard for trust and stability.
The key to tokenization is combining two worlds: traditional finance's expertise in legally custodying assets, and crypto's native, free infrastructure for 24/7 trading and liquidity. This fusion makes it possible to make previously untradable assets like private equity, art, or collectibles instantly liquid and accessible.
The next evolution in fintech will be regulated applications that offer seamless trading across traditional securities, tokenized assets, and native crypto. This framework allows direct user access to DeFi protocols like staking and lending from a single, compliant, and user-friendly platform, bridging the gap between two currently separate financial worlds.
Beyond regulatory clarity, a critical hurdle for enterprise adoption of stablecoins is their accounting treatment. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is currently deciding if stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents on a balance sheet, a move that would significantly lower friction for corporate use.
While stablecoins face regulatory uncertainty, major banks like J.P. Morgan and Boney are developing a competing product: tokenized deposits. These offer the same blockchain efficiencies for fund transfers but operate within the existing, trusted banking regulatory framework, presenting a more attractive, lower-risk alternative for institutional clients.
Despite promising instant, cheap cross-border payments, stablecoins lack features critical for corporate treasurers. The absence of FDIC insurance, a single standard ("singleness of money"), and interoperability between blockchains makes them too risky and fragmented for wholesale use.
Before stablecoins, launching financial services in N countries required N² unique integrations. Now, companies can build on a single dollar-stablecoin standard and instantly operate globally. Adding other local stablecoins becomes a simple N-style addition, radically simplifying global expansion.
While stablecoins gain attention, tokenized deposits offer similar benefits—like on-chain transactions—but operate within the existing, trusted regulatory banking framework. As they are simply bank liabilities on a blockchain, they may become a more palatable alternative for corporates seeking efficiency without regulatory uncertainty.
To avoid being classified as a bank, Coinbase's stablecoin model offers "rewards" for user activity like payments or trading, rather than paying interest directly on balances. This is a crucial legal distinction under new regulations allowing them to pass on yield from treasury reserves.