Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Shift hiring from finding a person for a role to finding a person with capabilities the team lacks. This approach ensures the new hire adds immediate, unique value, which boosts their sense of contribution and strengthens the entire team's collective skill set.

Related Insights

Stop asking "how" to solve a problem and start asking "who" is the right person to solve it. Shifting your mindset to hiring A+ players who can take ownership of outcomes is the key to unlocking the next level of growth and freeing up your own time.

Hiring for "cultural fit" can lead to homogenous teams and groupthink. Instead, leaders should seek a "cultural complement"—candidates who align with core values but bring different perspectives and experiences, creating a richer and more innovative team alchemy.

Founders fail at hiring because they try to replace themselves with a single person who can do everything—a unicorn that doesn't exist. Instead, break down the role into its core functions (e.g., the horn, the horse, the sparkle) and hire multiple, more easily-found specialists to fulfill those distinct needs.

Instead of hiring designers with similar profiles for easier staffing, intentionally seek out diverse skill sets that fill existing gaps. This leads to more interesting collaboration, broader capabilities, and mutual respect within the team.

Your internal monologue is a powerful hiring filter. Thinking, "I really have to fill this role" often leads to compromising on quality. The right hire sparks the thought, "I don't even care if I have a role for this person, I have to get them in."

In a fast-moving environment, rigid job descriptions are a hindrance. Instead of hiring for a specific role, recruit versatile "athletes" with high general aptitude. A single great person can fluidly move between delivery, sales, and product leadership, making them far more valuable than a specialist.

Elite hiring processes are bespoke and ad-hoc, not rigidly consistent. Treat the candidate as the atomic unit, not the job description. This means tailoring the interview experience—from who they meet to the topics discussed—to that specific person, rather than forcing everyone through an identical, robotic process.

The "attitude vs. aptitude" debate is misleading. Hire the person with the smallest skill gap for the role. For complex roles, hire for intelligence (defined as rate of learning), as smart people can bridge any skill or attitude gap faster.

Your internal monologue during hiring reveals if you're making the right choice. If you think, "I really need to fill this role," you're on the path to settling. The right candidate sparks the feeling of, "I don't even care if I have a role for this person, I have to get them in."

Instead of seeking a specific PM archetype (e.g., innovator, maximizer), focus on hiring individuals who bring unique perspectives, skills, or backgrounds. This approach builds a more resilient and versatile product organization, even if the new hire's style differs from the manager's.