The trend of 'vibe coding'—casually using prompts to generate code without rigor—is creating low-quality, unmaintainable software. The AI engineering community has reached its limit with this approach and is actively searching for a new development paradigm that marries AI's speed with traditional engineering's craft and reliability.

Using AI to code doesn't mean sacrificing craftsmanship. It shifts the craftsman's role from writing every line to being a director with a strong vision. The key is measuring the AI's output against that vision and ensuring each piece fits the larger puzzle correctly, not just functionally.

Instead of traditional coding, a simple, descriptive prompt was used with GitHub Spark to instantly generate a functional mobile app for a Halloween block party. This "vibe coding" approach is ideal for single-use, creative projects where speed trumps robust engineering.

High productivity isn't about using AI for everything. It's a disciplined workflow: breaking a task into sub-problems, using an LLM for high-leverage parts like scaffolding and tests, and reserving human focus for the core implementation. This avoids the sunk cost of forcing AI on unsuitable tasks.

Tim McLear used AI coding assistants to build custom apps for niche workflows, like partial document transcription and field research photo logging. He emphasizes that "no one was going to make me this app." The ability for non-specialists to quickly create such hyper-specific internal tools is a key, empowering benefit of AI-assisted development.

Visual "vibe coding" platforms, intended to simplify development, can add unnecessary complexity and scope creep to simple projects. When this happens, it's cheap and effective to abandon the tool and start from scratch in a code editor like Cursor to maintain simplicity.

While "vibe coding" tools are excellent for sparking interest and building initial prototypes, transitioning a project into a maintainable product requires learning the underlying code. AI code editors like Cursor act as the next step, helping users bridge the gap from prompt-based generation to hands-on software engineering.

Even for a simple personal project, starting with a Product Requirements Document (PRD) dramatically improves the output from AI code generation tools. Taking a few minutes to outline goals and features provides the necessary context for the AI to produce more accurate and relevant code, saving time on rework.

To ensure comprehension of AI-generated code, developer Terry Lynn created a "rubber duck" rule in his AI tool. This prompts the AI to explain code sections and even create pop quizzes about specific functions. This turns the development process into an active learning tool, ensuring he deeply understands the code he's shipping.